Fujii Tsutomu, Yamada Suguru, Murotani Kenta, Kanda Mitsuro, Sugimoto Hiroyuki, Nakao Akimasa, Kodera Yasuhiro
From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine (TF, SY, MK, HS, AN, YK), and Center for Clinical Research, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan (KM).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1647. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001647.
Combined arterial resection during pancreatectomy can be a challenging treatment, and outcome would be more favorable if the tumor becomes technically removable from the artery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is expected to achieve locoregional control and enable margin-negative resection. To investigate the effects of NACRT in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) which were deemed borderline resectable through preoperative imaging due to abutment of the major artery, including the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or common hepatic artery (CHA), but were still considered to be technically removable. In the current study, comparisons were make between 71 patients who underwent upfront surgery and 21 patients who underwent NACRT followed by surgery in the strategy to preserve the artery, using unmatched and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (UMIN000017115). Fifty patients in the upfront surgery group and 18 in the NACRT group underwent curative resection (70% vs 86%, respectively; P = 0.16). The results of the propensity score weighted logistic regressions indicated that the incidences of pathological lymph node metastasis and a pathological positive resection margin were significantly lower in the NACRT group (odds ratio, 0.006; P < 0.001 and odds ratio, 0.007; P < 0.001, respectively). Among the propensity-score matched patients, the estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates in the upfront surgery group were 66.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and those in the NACRT group were 80.0% and 65.2%, respectively. In conclusion, it was suggested that chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery provided clinical benefits in patients with PDACs in contact with the SMA or CHA.
胰腺切除术中联合动脉切除可能是一项具有挑战性的治疗方法,如果肿瘤在技术上能够从动脉上切除,预后可能会更好。新辅助放化疗(NACRT)有望实现局部区域控制并实现切缘阴性切除。本研究旨在探讨NACRT对因肠系膜上动脉(SMA)或肝总动脉(CHA)等主要动脉毗邻而在术前影像学检查中被判定为边界可切除但仍被认为在技术上可切除的胰腺腺癌(PDAC)患者的影响。在本研究中,采用非匹配和治疗权重逆概率分析(UMIN000017115),对71例接受直接手术的患者和21例接受NACRT后再手术以保留动脉的患者进行了比较。直接手术组的50例患者和NACRT组的18例患者接受了根治性切除(分别为70%和86%;P = 0.16)。倾向评分加权逻辑回归结果表明,NACRT组病理淋巴结转移和病理切缘阳性的发生率显著较低(优势比分别为0.006;P < 0.001和优势比为0.007;P < 0.001)。在倾向评分匹配的患者中,直接手术组的1年和2年估计生存率分别为66.7%和16.0%,NACRT组分别为80.0%和65.2%。总之,研究表明,先进行放化疗再手术对与SMA或CHA接触的PDAC患者具有临床益处。