• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量接受重复经颅磁刺激治疗患者耳鸣成分的噪声检测间隙与视觉模拟量表的联合应用

Combination of gaps in noise detection and visual analog scale for measuring tinnitus components in patients treated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

作者信息

Wang Hui, Li Bei, Wu Hongmin, Shi Haibo, Yin Shankai

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.

出版信息

Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Jun;43(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2015.09.004
PMID:26428287
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate gaps in noise (GIN) detection and visual analog scale (VAS) for measuring perceived tinnitus loudness and annoyance caused thereby. We quantified the outcomes and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on chronic tinnitus.

METHODS

Fourteen tinnitus patients with normal hearing underwent a 10 day course of active 1-Hz rTMS to the left region of the temporoparietal cortex. GIN (in which the matched pitch and loudness of tinnitus was used to determine the frequency and intensity of background noise) and VAS was used to assess tinnitus loudness and the extent of annoyance caused thereby. Both ten patients with tinnitus who underwent left temporoparietal sham stimulation and fifteen volunteers with normal hearing without tinnitus participated with GIN detection as a control. Correlations between VAS scores and GIN detection were determined via Spearman's correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The mean GIN thresholds of tinnitus-affected (5.87 ms) ears and the ears of control subjects (4.85 ms) differed significantly. In the tinnitus group, 42.8% (6/14) patients experienced significant reductions in tinnitus annoyance, as assessed by VAS. 71.4% (10/14) patients experienced significant reductions in tinnitus loudness, as evidenced by GIN evaluation. Three tinnitus subjects (21.4%) achieved 30% decrease of the threshold of GIN detection. There was no significant change in GIN detection and VAS scores after sham stimulation. A significant positive correlation was evident between GIN data and VAS scores (r=0.84, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gaps in noise detection, combined with VAS scores, affords a promising sensitive method by which to evaluate tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Low frequency rTMS significantly decreased tinnitus after the active, but not the sham, treatment.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估噪声间隙(GIN)检测以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)在测量感知到的耳鸣响度及其所致烦恼方面的差异。我们对重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗慢性耳鸣的结果和有效性进行了量化。

方法

14名听力正常的耳鸣患者接受了为期10天的对左侧颞顶叶皮质进行1赫兹主动rTMS治疗。使用GIN(利用耳鸣匹配的音高和响度来确定背景噪声的频率和强度)和VAS来评估耳鸣响度及其所致烦恼程度。10名接受左侧颞顶叶假刺激的耳鸣患者以及15名听力正常且无耳鸣的志愿者参与GIN检测作为对照。通过Spearman相关分析确定VAS评分与GIN检测之间的相关性。

结果

受耳鸣影响的耳朵(5.87毫秒)和对照组受试者耳朵(4.85毫秒)的平均GIN阈值存在显著差异。在耳鸣组中,通过VAS评估,42.8%(6/14)的患者耳鸣烦恼程度显著降低。通过GIN评估,71.4%(10/14)的患者耳鸣响度显著降低。3名耳鸣受试者(21.4%)GIN检测阈值降低了30%。假刺激后GIN检测和VAS评分无显著变化。GIN数据与VAS评分之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.84,p < 0.001)。

结论

噪声间隙检测结合VAS评分,为评估耳鸣响度和烦恼程度提供了一种很有前景的敏感方法。低频rTMS在主动治疗而非假治疗后能显著降低耳鸣。

相似文献

1
Combination of gaps in noise detection and visual analog scale for measuring tinnitus components in patients treated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.用于测量接受重复经颅磁刺激治疗患者耳鸣成分的噪声检测间隙与视觉模拟量表的联合应用
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Jun;43(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2
A Pilot Study of EEG Source Analysis Based Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Tinnitus.基于脑电图源分析的重复经颅磁刺激治疗耳鸣的初步研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0139622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139622. eCollection 2015.
3
Comparison of the outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the ipsilateral and contralateral auditory cortex in unilateral tinnitus.单侧耳鸣患者中重复经颅磁刺激同侧和对侧听觉皮层的疗效比较。
Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Sep;33(3):211-5. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.801353. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
4
Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in unilateral tinnitus.重复经颅磁刺激治疗单侧耳鸣的长期疗效。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Sep;124(9):2155-60. doi: 10.1002/lary.24722. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
5
Factor Analysis of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Temporoparietal Junction for Tinnitus.低频重复经颅磁刺激颞顶联合区治疗耳鸣的因素分析
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:2814056. doi: 10.1155/2016/2814056. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Contralateral versus ipsilateral rTMS of temporoparietal cortex for the treatment of chronic unilateral tinnitus: comparative study.对侧与同侧颞顶叶皮层重复经颅磁刺激治疗慢性单侧耳鸣的对比研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jul;17(7):976-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02965.x. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
7
Neural activity during attentional conflict predicts reduction in tinnitus perception following rTMS.注意力冲突期间的神经活动可预测重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)后耳鸣感知的减轻。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):934-943. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
Difference in Tinnitus Treatment Outcome According to the Pulse Number of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.根据重复经颅磁刺激的脉冲数对耳鸣治疗结果的差异
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(8):1450-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000802.
9
Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on chronic tinnitus.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对慢性耳鸣的影响。
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2006 Dec(556):96-101. doi: 10.1080/03655230600895465.
10
One-year follow up of patients with chronic tinnitus treated with left temporoparietal rTMS.对接受左侧颞顶叶重复经颅磁刺激治疗的慢性耳鸣患者进行的一年随访。
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Mar;16(3):404-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02522.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Ipsilateral, Contralateral or Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Lateralized Tinnitus: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study.同侧、对侧或双侧重复经颅磁刺激对单侧耳鸣患者的影响:一项安慰剂对照随机研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 2;12(6):733. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060733.
2
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗慢性耳鸣的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02947-9.
3
Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗慢性耳鸣的系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 May 2;2020:3141278. doi: 10.1155/2020/3141278. eCollection 2020.
4
RTMS parameters in tinnitus trials: a systematic review.耳鸣试验中的重复经颅磁刺激参数:系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 21;9(1):12190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48750-9.
5
Changes in tinnitus after vestibular schwannoma surgery.前庭神经鞘瘤手术后耳鸣的变化。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 11;9(1):1743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38582-y.