Pineli Lívia de Lacerda de Oliveira, Aguiar Lorena Andrade de, Fiusa Anndressa, Botelho Raquel Braz de Assunção, Zandonadi Renata Puppin, Melo Lauro
College of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasilia, 70910-900, Brazil.
College of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasilia, 70910-900, Brazil.
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:239-244. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
The presence of added sugars (AS) in the diet is associated with increased risk of obesity and other chronic diseases. We assessed sensory impact of lowering AS in orange nectar, aiming at new WHO sugar guideline. Ideal sweetness by just-about-right (JAR) tests (60 consumers), difference and rejection thresholds (36 and 35 assessors), and acceptance and sensory profile by Check-all-that-apply (CATA) tests (100 consumers) were performed. JAR test comprised six concentrations of AS from 12% down to 4.5%. Thresholds tests comprised orange nectars at reference sugar concentration (10%) and at lower sugar levels. Acceptance and CATA tests compared reference, ideal sweetness and thresholds concentrations. There were two groups of consumers; one with ideal sweetness lower at 5.5% AS and another with ideal sweetness at standard 10.5% AS. The average ideal sweetness among all consumers was 7.3% AS. The difference threshold from the reference at 10.5% AS was at 8.5% AS and the rejection threshold was 7.2%. Overall acceptance of nectar with 8.5% and 7.2% AS was similar to reference and higher than acceptance of nectar with 5.5%. However, after cluster analysis, nectars with 5.5% AS did not differ from nectars with 8.5% or 7.2% AS, suggesting the possibility of a gradual reduction until 5.5% in the long term. Lowering AS to 7.2% or 5.5% caused significant changes in viscosity, sweet odor, bitterness and sweetness in comparison to the reference concentration. Lowering sugar from 10% to 8.5% did not affect acceptance or sensory attributes, and could be indicated for a first reduction. Results indicate that a gradual reduction to 7.2% and 5.5% would be feasible. Reductions can remove 3150-9450 tons of sugar per year from the Brazilian diet resulting in healthier beverages.
饮食中添加糖(AS)的存在与肥胖及其他慢性疾病风险增加相关。我们针对世界卫生组织新的糖指南,评估了降低橙汁饮料中添加糖的感官影响。通过恰如其分(JAR)测试(60名消费者)评估理想甜度,通过差异阈值和拒收阈值测试(36名和35名评估员),以及通过复选框(CATA)测试(100名消费者)评估接受度和感官特征。JAR测试包含六种从12%降至4.5%的添加糖浓度。阈值测试包括参考糖浓度(10%)和较低糖水平的橙汁饮料。接受度和CATA测试比较了参考、理想甜度和阈值浓度。有两组消费者,一组理想甜度较低,为5.5%的添加糖,另一组理想甜度为标准的10.5%的添加糖。所有消费者的平均理想甜度为7.3%的添加糖。10.5%添加糖时与参考值的差异阈值为8.5%的添加糖,拒收阈值为7.2%。添加糖含量为8.5%和7.2%的饮料总体接受度与参考值相似,且高于添加糖含量为5.5%的饮料。然而,聚类分析后,添加糖含量为5.5%的饮料与添加糖含量为8.5%或7.2% 的饮料并无差异,这表明从长远来看有可能逐步降至5.5%。与参考浓度相比,将添加糖降至7.2%或5.(此处原文有误,应为5.5%)会导致粘度、甜味、苦味和甜度发生显著变化。将糖从10%降至8.5%不会影响接受度或感官属性,可作为首次降低的指标。结果表明,逐步降至7.2%和5.5%是可行的。降低添加糖量每年可从巴西人的饮食中去除3150 - 9450吨糖,从而生产出更健康的饮料。