Suppr超能文献

透光度/不透明度及色泽对二硅酸锂陶瓷弯曲强度的影响

Influence of translucence/opacity and shade in the flexural strength of lithium disilicate ceramics.

作者信息

Santos Mila Oliveira, do Amaral Flávia Lucisano Botelho, França Fabiana Mantovani Gomes, Basting Roberta Tarkany

机构信息

Department of Dental Prostheses, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Bairro Swift, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Bairro Swift, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):394-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.164053.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lithium disilicate ceramic system consists of glass ceramic ingots with different grades of translucence which may influence its flexural strength.

AIMS

To assess the three-point flexural strength of the different lithium disilicate-based ceramic ingots (IPS e.max Press/Ivoclar Vivadent) with different levels of translucence and shade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six groups of ceramic ingots were selected to represent different levels of translucence and shade (HTA1, HTBL2, LTA2, LTB2, MO2, and HO). They measured 25 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm (n = 10), according to ISO 6872 specifications, and tested on a universal test machine (EMIC).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The results (in MPa) were: HTA1 = 392.98; HTBL2 = 390.74; LTA2 = 390.46; LTB2 = 389.92; MO2 = 390.43; HO = 391.96. ANOVA showed no significant difference among groups (P = 0.1528).

CONCLUSIONS

Different levels of translucence, opacity and shade of ingots did not affect their mechanical strength, and the use of these ceramics should be guided by the esthetic demands of each clinical situation.

摘要

背景

二硅酸锂陶瓷系统由具有不同半透明等级的玻璃陶瓷铸锭组成,这可能会影响其抗弯强度。

目的

评估不同半透明等级和色度的不同二硅酸锂基陶瓷铸锭(IPS e.max Press/Ivoclar Vivadent)的三点抗弯强度。

材料与方法

选择六组陶瓷铸锭以代表不同的半透明等级和色度(HTA1、HTBL2、LTA2、LTB2、MO2和HO)。根据ISO 6872规格,它们的尺寸为25 mm×5 mm×2 mm(n = 10),并在万能试验机(EMIC)上进行测试。

所用统计分析方法

采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)(α = 0.05)。

结果

结果(单位为MPa)为:HTA1 = 392.98;HTBL2 = 390.74;LTA2 = 390.46;LTB2 = 389.92;MO2 = 390.43;HO = 391.96。方差分析显示各组之间无显著差异(P = 0.1528)。

结论

铸锭不同程度的半透明性、不透明度和色度不影响其机械强度,这些陶瓷的使用应根据每种临床情况的美学需求来指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6265/4578185/f34610cd5c7e/JCD-18-394-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验