• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1区再植后的短期强度不足

Short-Term Strength Deficit Following Zone 1 Replantations.

作者信息

Roh Si Young, Shim Woo Cheol, Lee Kyung Jin, Lee Dong Chul, Kim Jin Soo, Yang Jae-Won

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gwangmyeong Sungae Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Korea.

Gangnam Jaejun Plastic Clinic for Hand and Plastic Surgery, Pyeongtaek, Korea.

出版信息

Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):614-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.614. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

DOI:10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.614
PMID:26430634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4579174/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand strength deficit following digital replantation is usually attributed to the mechanical deficiency of the replanted digit. Zone 1 replantation, however, should not be associated with any mechanical deficit, as the joint and tendon are intact. We evaluate short-term motor functions in patients who have undergone single-digit zone 1 replantation.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent zone 1 replantation. Hand and pinch strengths were evaluated using standard dynamometers. Each set of measurements was pooled according to follow-up periods (within 1 month, 1 to 2 months, 2 to 3 months, and after 3 months). The uninjured hand was used as reference for measurements.

RESULTS

The review identified 53 patients who had undergone zone 1 replantation and presented for follow-up visits. Compared to the uninjured hand, dynamometer measurements revealed significantly less strength for the hand with replanted digit at one month. The relative mean grip, pulp, and key pinch strength were 31%, 46%, and 48% of the uninjured hand. These three strength measurements gradually increased, with relative strength measurements of 59%, 70%, and 78% for 4-month follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of joint or tendon injury, strength of the injured hand was significantly lower than that of the uninjured hand during the 4 months following replantation. Improved rehabilitation strategies are needed to diminish the short-term negative impact that an isolated zone 1 replantation has on the overall hand strength.

摘要

背景

手指再植后手部力量不足通常归因于再植手指的机械功能缺陷。然而,1区再植不应与任何机械功能缺陷相关,因为关节和肌腱是完整的。我们评估了接受单指1区再植患者的短期运动功能。

方法

对所有接受1区再植的患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。使用标准测力计评估手部和捏力。每组测量值根据随访期(1个月内、1至2个月、2至3个月以及3个月后)进行汇总。以未受伤的手作为测量的参照。

结果

该回顾确定了53例接受1区再植并前来随访的患者。与未受伤的手相比,测力计测量显示再植手指的手在1个月时力量明显较小。相对平均握力、指腹捏力和钥匙捏力分别为未受伤手的31%、46%和48%。这三项力量测量值逐渐增加,4个月随访时相对力量测量值分别为59%、70%和78%。

结论

尽管没有关节或肌腱损伤,但在再植后的4个月内,受伤手的力量明显低于未受伤的手。需要改进康复策略,以减少单纯1区再植对整体手部力量的短期负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5361/4579174/7c07f3c88905/aps-42-614-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5361/4579174/c9c416e5a9fc/aps-42-614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5361/4579174/7c07f3c88905/aps-42-614-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5361/4579174/c9c416e5a9fc/aps-42-614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5361/4579174/7c07f3c88905/aps-42-614-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-Term Strength Deficit Following Zone 1 Replantations.1区再植后的短期强度不足
Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):614-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.614. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
2
Predictors of Hand Dexterity after Single-Digit Replantation.单指再植后手灵巧性的预测因素。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Mar;35(3):194-197. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669446. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
3
Functional outcomes of replantation following radiocarpal amputation.腕关节离断术后再植的功能结局
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Feb;40(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
4
Long-term results of transmetacarpal replantation.经掌骨再植的长期结果。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(7):704-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.02.030. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
5
Late results in replanted digits. Is replantation of a single digit worthwhile?再植指的远期结果。单指再植是否值得?
Acta Chir Belg. 1992 Jul-Aug;92(4):204-8.
6
Long term follow-up after finger replantation.手指再植后的长期随访。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Feb;33(1):59-64. doi: 10.1177/1753193407088499.
7
Hand function after replantation or revascularization of upper extremity injuries. A follow-up study of 21 cases operated on 1979-1985 in Göteborg.上肢损伤再植或血管重建后的手部功能。对1979年至1985年在哥德堡接受手术的21例患者的随访研究。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1988;22(1):93-101. doi: 10.3109/02844318809097941.
8
Sensory recovery following digital replantation.手指再植后的感觉恢复
Microsurgery. 1990;11(3):236-42. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920110311.
9
Long-term functional results of digital replantation: A survey of 28 patients.手指再植的长期功能结果:对28例患者的调查。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2019 Dec;38(6):375-380. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
10
Functional results of dynamic splinting after transmetacarpal, wrist, and distal forearm replantation.经掌骨、腕部及前臂远端再植术后动态夹板固定的功能结果。
J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Oct;20(5):584-90. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80115-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving hand therapy delivery during care transitions in multisystem trauma patients.改善多系统创伤患者护理交接期间的手部治疗服务。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002249.
2
Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Digital Replantation: A Systematic Review.数字再植的结果报告与结果指标:一项系统评价
J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Aug;12(2):85-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701324. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
3
Factors associated with limited hand motion after hand trauma.手部创伤后与手部活动受限相关的因素。

本文引用的文献

1
Normative measurements of grip and pinch strengths of 21st century korean population.21世纪韩国人群握力和捏力的标准测量值。
Arch Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;40(1):52-6. doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.1.52. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2
Hand grip strength: outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status.手握力:结局预测指标和营养状况标志物。
Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;30(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
3
Fingertip replantations: importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results.指尖再植:静脉吻合的重要性及临床结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e14183. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014183.
Hand Surg. 2009;14(1):1-6. doi: 10.1142/S0218810409004177.
4
Grip strength in healthy caucasian adults: reference values.健康白种成年人的握力:参考值
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Apr;33(4):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.008.
5
Long term follow-up after finger replantation.手指再植后的长期随访。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Feb;33(1):59-64. doi: 10.1177/1753193407088499.
6
Individual finger strength: are the ulnar digits "powerful"?个体手指力量:尺侧手指“有力”吗?
J Hand Ther. 2004 Jul-Sep;17(3):364-7. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.04.006.
7
Average versus maximum grip strength: which is more consistent?
J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Feb;29(1):82-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.09.012.
8
Tendon function after replantation: prognostic factors and strategies to enhance total active motion.再植术后的肌腱功能:预后因素及提高总主动活动度的策略
Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Aug;51(2):141-6. doi: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000058499.74279.D8.
9
Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation.静脉吻合在指尖再植中的意义。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Mar;111(3):1151-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000046497.88549.E0.
10
Replantation of the thumb, especially avulsion.拇指再植,尤其是撕脱伤再植。
Hand Clin. 2001 Aug;17(3):433-45.