Lee Sang Yeop, Kwon Hee Jung, Bae Hyoung Won, Seo Sang Jin, Lee Yun Ha, Hong Samin, Seong Gong Je, Kim Chan Yun
a Department of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital , Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
b Department of Ophthalmology , CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University , Seongnam , Republic of Korea.
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Jul;41(7):957-64. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1075219. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
To evaluate and compare the frequency, type and cause of imaging artifacts incurred when using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS OCT) and Cirrus HD OCT in the same patients on the same day.
From left eye OCT results of 72 patients, disc area and macular area data could be compared between the two types of OCT. For each scan, the final printout report and source data were examined. For comparison between the two types of OCT, only source image data were used because of differences in the final printout report format.
There were no significant differences in the artifact frequencies between the two groups in either area (disc area: 35.9% of SS OCT, 42.2% of Cirrus OCT, p = 0.523; Macular area: 24.2% of SS OCT, 22.7% of Cirrus OCT, p = 1.00). The overall results of artifact comparison between the two types of OCTs also showed no significant differences. Boundary misidentification was the most common type of artifact observed, and ocular pathology was the most common cause of artifact in both types of OCTs. Among ocular pathologies, the epiretinal membrane (ERM) was the most common cause of OCT artifact production in both types of OCTs.
There was no significant difference in the frequency, type and cause of artifacts between SS OCT and Cirrus HD OCT. Artifacts in OCT can influence the interpretation of OCT results. In particular, ERM around the optic disc could contribute to OCT artifacts and should be considered in glaucoma diagnosis or during patient follow-up using OCT.
评估并比较同一天在同一患者中使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS OCT)和Cirrus HD OCT时产生的成像伪像的频率、类型及原因。
从72例患者的左眼OCT结果中,可比较两种OCT的视盘区域和黄斑区域数据。对于每次扫描,检查最终打印报告和源数据。由于最终打印报告格式不同,在两种OCT的比较中仅使用源图像数据。
两组在任一区域的伪像频率均无显著差异(视盘区域:SS OCT为35.9%,Cirrus OCT为42.2%,p = 0.523;黄斑区域:SS OCT为24.2%,Cirrus OCT为22.7%,p = 1.00)。两种OCT之间伪像比较的总体结果也无显著差异。边界误识别是观察到的最常见的伪像类型,眼部病变是两种OCT中伪像的最常见原因。在眼部病变中,视网膜前膜(ERM)是两种OCT中OCT伪像产生的最常见原因。
SS OCT和Cirrus HD OCT在伪像的频率、类型和原因方面无显著差异。OCT中的伪像会影响OCT结果的解读。特别是视盘周围的ERM可能导致OCT伪像,在青光眼诊断或使用OCT对患者进行随访时应予以考虑。