Suppr超能文献

在个体患者层面验证howRu问卷和howRwe问卷。

Validation of the howRu and howRwe questionnaires at the individual patient level.

作者信息

Hendriks Steven H, Rutgers Jojanneke, van Dijk Peter R, Groenier Klaas H, Bilo Henk J G, Kleefstra Nanne, Kocks Janwillem W H, van Hateren Kornelis J J, Blanker Marco H

机构信息

Diabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Department of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 2;15:447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1093-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The howRu and howRwe are new short questionnaires which are meant to measure health-related quality of life and patient experience. However, validation at the individual patient level has not yet taken place. We aimed to investigate the validity of both questionnaires at the individual patient level.

METHODS

In this prospective validation study, patients were asked to complete both questionnaires and comment on their answers in a semi-structured in-depth interview. Based on the transcribed interviews, a panel of 45 general practitioners and 45 patients filled out the questionnaires as they thought the patients had completed them. The questionnaires were considered valid instruments when a reliable and acceptable level of agreement was reached between the patient's score and the score of a review panel, defined as a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of ≥0.70. Bland-Altman plots were also made.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included. The CCC of the howRu total score of the review panel and patients was 0.80 (95 % CI 0.73 to 0.86). Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference of -0.96 and the limits of agreement ranged from -2.87 to 0.95. The CCC of the howRwe total score was 0.57 (95 % CI 0.42 to 0.69). The mean difference on the Bland-Altman plots was -0.54 and the limits of agreement ranged from -3.59 to 2.52.

CONCLUSIONS

The howRu seems to be a valid questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life at the individual patient level. We do not advice to use the tested version of the howRwe questionnaire for assessing patient experience at the individual patient level.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01830803 . Registration date: 5 April 2013.

摘要

背景

howRu和howRwe是旨在测量健康相关生活质量和患者体验的新型简短问卷。然而,尚未在个体患者层面进行效度验证。我们旨在调查这两种问卷在个体患者层面的效度。

方法

在这项前瞻性效度验证研究中,要求患者完成这两种问卷,并在半结构化深度访谈中对其答案进行评论。根据转录的访谈内容,由45名全科医生和45名患者组成的小组按照他们认为患者填写问卷的方式填写问卷。当患者得分与评审小组得分之间达到可靠且可接受的一致水平时,问卷被视为有效工具,该一致水平定义为一致性相关系数(CCC)≥0.70。还制作了布兰德-奥特曼图。

结果

纳入了90名患者。评审小组和患者的howRu总分的CCC为0.80(95%CI 0.73至0.86)。布兰德-奥特曼图显示平均差异为-0.96,一致性界限为-2.87至0.95。howRwe总分的CCC为0.57(95%CI 0.42至0.69)。布兰德-奥特曼图上的平均差异为-0.54,一致性界限为-3.59至2.52。

结论

howRu似乎是一种在个体患者层面测量健康相关生活质量的有效问卷。我们不建议使用howRwe问卷的测试版本在个体患者层面评估患者体验。

试验注册

该研究已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01830803。注册日期:2013年4月5日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验