Hendriks Steven H, Rutgers Jojanneke, van Dijk Peter R, Groenier Klaas H, Bilo Henk J G, Kleefstra Nanne, Kocks Janwillem W H, van Hateren Kornelis J J, Blanker Marco H
Diabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 2;15:447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1093-8.
The howRu and howRwe are new short questionnaires which are meant to measure health-related quality of life and patient experience. However, validation at the individual patient level has not yet taken place. We aimed to investigate the validity of both questionnaires at the individual patient level.
In this prospective validation study, patients were asked to complete both questionnaires and comment on their answers in a semi-structured in-depth interview. Based on the transcribed interviews, a panel of 45 general practitioners and 45 patients filled out the questionnaires as they thought the patients had completed them. The questionnaires were considered valid instruments when a reliable and acceptable level of agreement was reached between the patient's score and the score of a review panel, defined as a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of ≥0.70. Bland-Altman plots were also made.
Ninety patients were included. The CCC of the howRu total score of the review panel and patients was 0.80 (95 % CI 0.73 to 0.86). Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference of -0.96 and the limits of agreement ranged from -2.87 to 0.95. The CCC of the howRwe total score was 0.57 (95 % CI 0.42 to 0.69). The mean difference on the Bland-Altman plots was -0.54 and the limits of agreement ranged from -3.59 to 2.52.
The howRu seems to be a valid questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life at the individual patient level. We do not advice to use the tested version of the howRwe questionnaire for assessing patient experience at the individual patient level.
The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01830803 . Registration date: 5 April 2013.
howRu和howRwe是旨在测量健康相关生活质量和患者体验的新型简短问卷。然而,尚未在个体患者层面进行效度验证。我们旨在调查这两种问卷在个体患者层面的效度。
在这项前瞻性效度验证研究中,要求患者完成这两种问卷,并在半结构化深度访谈中对其答案进行评论。根据转录的访谈内容,由45名全科医生和45名患者组成的小组按照他们认为患者填写问卷的方式填写问卷。当患者得分与评审小组得分之间达到可靠且可接受的一致水平时,问卷被视为有效工具,该一致水平定义为一致性相关系数(CCC)≥0.70。还制作了布兰德-奥特曼图。
纳入了90名患者。评审小组和患者的howRu总分的CCC为0.80(95%CI 0.73至0.86)。布兰德-奥特曼图显示平均差异为-0.96,一致性界限为-2.87至0.95。howRwe总分的CCC为0.57(95%CI 0.42至0.69)。布兰德-奥特曼图上的平均差异为-0.54,一致性界限为-3.59至2.52。
howRu似乎是一种在个体患者层面测量健康相关生活质量的有效问卷。我们不建议使用howRwe问卷的测试版本在个体患者层面评估患者体验。
该研究已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01830803。注册日期:2013年4月5日。