Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands; International Media and Entertainment Management Academy for Digital Entertainment NHTV University of Applied Sciences, Breda, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Nov;74:60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
Knowing what predicts discontinuation or success of psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is important to improve treatments. Many variables have been reported in the literature, but replication is needed and investigating what therapy process underlies the findings is necessary to understand why variables predict outcome. Using data of an RCT comparing Schema Therapy and Transference Focused Psychotherapy as treatments for BPD, variables derived from the literature were tested as predictors of discontinuation and treatment success. Participants were 86 adult outpatients (80 women, mean age 30.5 years) with a primary diagnosis of BPD who had on average received 3 previous treatment modalities. First, single predictors were tested with logistic regression, controlling for treatment type (and medication use in case of treatment success). Next, with multivariate backward logistic regression essential predictors were detected. Baseline hostility and childhood physical abuse predicted treatment discontinuation. Baseline subjective burden of dissociation predicted a smaller chance of recovery. A second study demonstrated that in-session dissociation, assessed from session audiotapes, mediated the observed effects of baseline dissociation on recovery, indicating that dissociation during sessions interferes with treatment effectiveness. The results suggest that specifically addressing high hostility, childhood abuse, and in-session dissociation might reduce dropout and lack of effectiveness of treatment.
了解哪些因素可以预测边缘型人格障碍(BPD)心理治疗的中断或成功,对于改善治疗方法非常重要。许多变量在文献中已有报道,但需要进行复制,并且有必要调查治疗过程中哪些因素是导致这些发现的基础,以便了解为什么某些变量可以预测治疗结果。本研究使用了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,比较了图式治疗和移情焦点心理治疗作为 BPD 的治疗方法,对文献中得出的变量进行了测试,以评估其对治疗中断和治疗成功的预测作用。研究参与者为 86 名成年门诊患者(80 名女性,平均年龄 30.5 岁),主要诊断为 BPD,平均接受过 3 种先前的治疗方式。首先,使用逻辑回归进行单因素预测,控制治疗类型(以及治疗成功情况下的药物使用)。然后,使用多元向后逻辑回归检测基本预测因素。基线时的敌意和儿童期身体虐待预测治疗中断。基线时的分离主观负担预测康复机会较小。第二项研究表明,从会话录音带评估的会话中分离,中介了基线分离对康复的影响,这表明会话期间的分离会干扰治疗效果。研究结果表明,专门针对高敌意、儿童期虐待和会话中分离等因素,可能会降低治疗的中断率和治疗效果不佳的发生率。