Meyers Frederick J, Mathur Ambika, Fuhrmann Cynthia N, O'Brien Theresa C, Wefes Inge, Labosky Patricia A, Duncan D'Anne S, August Avery, Feig Andrew, Gould Kathleen L, Friedlander Michael J, Schaffer Chris B, Van Wart Audra, Chalkley Roger
*Health System, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA; The Graduate School, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Graduate School, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA; Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; Biomedical Research Education and Training and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; **Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA; and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
*Health System, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA; The Graduate School, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Graduate School, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA; Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; Biomedical Research Education and Training and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; **Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA; and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
FASEB J. 2016 Feb;30(2):507-14. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-276139. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
Recent national reports and commentaries on the current status and needs of the U.S. biomedical research workforce have highlighted the limited career development opportunities for predoctoral and postdoctoral trainees in academia, yet little attention is paid to preparation for career pathways outside of the traditional faculty path. Recognizing this issue, in 2013, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund issued a request for application titled "NIH Director's Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Award: Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST)." These 5-yr 1-time grants, awarded to 17 single or partnering institutions, were designed to develop sustainable approaches to broaden graduate and postgraduate training, aimed at creating training programs that reflect the range of career options that trainees may ultimately pursue. These institutions have formed a consortium in order to work together to develop, evaluate, share, and disseminate best practices and challenges. This is a first report on the early experiences of the consortium and the scope of participating BEST programs. In this report, we describe the state of the U.S. biomedical workforce and development of the BEST award, variations of programmatic approaches to assist with program design without BEST funding, and novel approaches to engage faculty in career development programs. To test the effectiveness of these BEST programs, external evaluators will assess their outcomes not only over the 5 yr grant period but also for an additional 10 yr beyond award completion.
近期有关美国生物医学研究人员现状与需求的国家报告及评论强调,学术界博士前和博士后学员的职业发展机会有限,然而对于传统教师职业路径之外的职业发展准备却鲜有关注。认识到这一问题后,2013年,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)共同基金发布了一份名为“NIH主任生物医学研究人员创新奖:拓宽科学培训经验(BEST)”的申请请求。这些为期5年的一次性拨款授予了17个单一或合作机构,旨在开发可持续的方法来拓宽研究生和博士后培训,目标是创建反映学员最终可能追求的一系列职业选择的培训项目。这些机构组成了一个联盟,以便共同努力开发、评估、分享和传播最佳实践及挑战。这是关于该联盟早期经验以及参与BEST项目范围的第一份报告。在本报告中,我们描述了美国生物医学研究人员的现状以及BEST奖的发展情况、在没有BEST资金的情况下协助项目设计的项目方法变体,以及让教师参与职业发展项目的新方法。为了测试这些BEST项目的有效性,外部评估人员不仅将在5年拨款期内评估其成果,还将在奖项结束后的额外10年内进行评估。