• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师写作小组:有保障的写作时间和小组支持的影响。

Faculty writing groups: The impact of protected writing time and group support.

作者信息

Kwan Patchareeya P, Sharp Shannon, Mason Sarah, Saetermoe Carrie L

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330, United States.

Center for Research Evaluation, University of Mississippi, United State.

出版信息

Int J Educ Res Open. 2021;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100100. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100100
PMID:35199058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8863135/
Abstract

Faculty at teaching institutions carry high teaching loads, leaving little time to write manuscripts or grant applications, let alone getting them published or awarded. This manuscript describes the impact of protected writing time for faculty at a higher education, teaching institution who committed to focused, uninterrupted writing time on a weekly basis and exchanged writing challenges and tips with colleagues. A mixed methods approach was used to assess the impacts of the writing group which found increased productivity (manuscripts and publications, proposals and grants) and sense of a research community with enhanced structural knowledge, camaraderie, and morale.

摘要

教学机构的教员承担着繁重的教学任务,几乎没有时间撰写手稿或申请科研基金,更不用说将其发表或获得资助了。本文描述了在一所高等教育教学机构中,为教员提供受保护的写作时间所产生的影响。这些教员每周都有专门的、不间断的写作时间,并与同事交流写作挑战和技巧。采用了混合方法来评估写作小组的影响,结果发现写作小组提高了生产力(手稿和出版物、提案和科研基金),增强了研究社区的意识,提升了结构知识、同志情谊和士气。

相似文献

1
Faculty writing groups: The impact of protected writing time and group support.教师写作小组:有保障的写作时间和小组支持的影响。
Int J Educ Res Open. 2021;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100100. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Twelve tips for writing educational research grant proposals.撰写教育研究资助提案的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):450-3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668246. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
3
The Medical Writing Center Model in an Academic Teaching Hospital.医学写作中心在学术教学医院中的模式。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 Dec;31(4):742-749. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10020-w. Epub 2024 May 18.
4
Assessment of the Impact of Teaching Demands on Research Productivity Among Doctoral Nursing Program Faculty.评估教学要求对护理学博士项目教员研究生产力的影响。
J Prof Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
The writing retreat: a high-yield clinical faculty development opportunity in academic writing.写作静修活动:学术写作中一项高产出的临床教师发展机会。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):299-302. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00159.1.
6
Recommendations for approaching the introduction section of manuscripts and grant applications.撰写稿件和申请拨款的引言部分的建议。
Can J Dent Hyg. 2020 Feb 1;54(1):42-44.
7
Peer support of a faculty "writers' circle" increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship.教师“写作圈”的同伴支持可增强开展学术研究的信心并提高其效率。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
8
Developing a scholarship community.建立一个奖学金团体。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(3):289-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00049.x.
9
Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.基于教师的同行评审稿件写作工作坊的实施与成果
J Prof Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.撰写医学教育领域的出版文章:教师发展研讨会和同行写作小组的益处
Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e280-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590802337120.

引用本文的文献

1
Who is teaching anatomy? An examination of the demographic characteristics, academic backgrounds, and professional responsibilities of US anatomy teachers.谁在教授解剖学?对美国解剖学教师的人口统计学特征、学术背景和职业职责的考察。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Apr;18(4):335-346. doi: 10.1002/ase.70005. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
2
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.一项旨在减少随机试验中发表偏倚的活动的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;13(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.
3
Mentoring and Supporting Our Next Generation of Women Toxicologists.指导与支持我们下一代女性毒理学家。
Front Toxicol. 2022 Jun 30;4:920664. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.920664. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Faculty member writing groups support productivity.教师写作小组有助于提高写作效率。
Clin Teach. 2019 Dec;16(6):565-569. doi: 10.1111/tct.12923. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
2
Design and Evaluation of a Longitudinal Faculty Development Program to Advance Scholarly Writing Among Pharmacy Practice Faculty.设计和评估一项纵向教师发展计划,以提高药学实践教师的学术写作水平。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6556. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6556.
3
The origin and implementation of the Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training programs: an NIH common fund initiative.科学培训项目拓展经验计划的起源与实施:一项美国国立卫生研究院共同基金倡议
FASEB J. 2016 Feb;30(2):507-14. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-276139. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
4
Peer support of a faculty "writers' circle" increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship.教师“写作圈”的同伴支持可增强开展学术研究的信心并提高其效率。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
5
The writing retreat: a high-yield clinical faculty development opportunity in academic writing.写作静修活动:学术写作中一项高产出的临床教师发展机会。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):299-302. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00159.1.
6
Using a writing group to promote faculty scholarship.利用写作小组促进教师学术研究。
Nurse Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181c42133.
7
The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.团队科学的科学:该领域概述及增刊介绍
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
8
A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity.一个关于教师和系部研究生产力的理论、实践、预测模型。
Acad Med. 2005 Mar;80(3):225-37. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200503000-00006.
9
A physician peer support writing group.一个医生同伴支持写作小组。
Fam Med. 2003 Mar;35(3):195-201.
10
Critical factors in the determination of focus group size.
Fam Pract. 1995 Dec;12(4):474-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.4.474.