Lee Ellen L, Craig Matthew, Scarboro Mark
a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Human Injury Research Division , Washington , DC.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S115-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1062888.
The purpose of this study was to use the detailed medical injury information in the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) to evaluate patterns of rib fractures in real-world crash occupants in both belted and unbelted restraint conditions. Fracture patterns binned into rib regional levels were examined to determine normative trends associated with belt use and other possible contributing factors.
Front row adult occupants with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3+ rib fractures, in frontal crashes with a deployed frontal airbag, were selected from the CIREN database. The circumferential location of each rib fracture (with respect to the sternum) was documented using a previously published method (Ritchie et al. 2006) and digital computed tomography scans. Fracture patterns for different crash and occupant parameters (restraint use, involved physical component, occupant kinematics, crash principal direction of force, and occupant age) were compared qualitatively and quantitatively.
There were 158 belted and 44 unbelted occupants included in this study. For belted occupants, fractures were mainly located near the path of the shoulder belt, with the majority of fractures occurring on the inboard (with respect to the vehicle) side of the thorax. For unbelted occupants, fractures were approximately symmetric and distributed across both sides of the thorax. There were negligible differences in fracture patterns between occupants with frontal (0°) and near side (330° to 350° for drivers; 10° to 30° for passengers) crash principal directions of force but substantial differences between groups when occupant kinematics (and contacts within the vehicle) were considered. Age also affected fracture pattern, with fractures tending to occur more anteriorly in older occupants and more laterally in younger occupants (both belted and unbelted).
Results of this study confirmed with real-world data that rib fracture patterns in unbelted occupants were more distributed and symmetric across the thorax compared to belted occupants in crashes with a deployed frontal airbag. Other factors, such as occupant kinematics and occupant age, also produced differing patterns of fractures. Normative data on rib fracture patterns in real-world occupants can contribute to understanding injury mechanisms and the role of different causation factors, which can ultimately help prevent fractures and improve vehicle safety.
本研究旨在利用碰撞损伤研究与工程网络(CIREN)中的详细医学损伤信息,评估在现实世界碰撞事故中,系安全带和未系安全带两种约束条件下驾乘人员的肋骨骨折模式。对按肋骨区域水平分类的骨折模式进行检查,以确定与安全带使用及其他可能影响因素相关的标准趋势。
从CIREN数据库中选取在配备了前部安全气囊的正面碰撞事故中,简明损伤定级(AIS)为3级及以上肋骨骨折的前排成年驾乘人员。使用先前发表的方法(Ritchie等人,2006年)以及数字计算机断层扫描,记录每处肋骨骨折相对于胸骨的周向位置。对不同碰撞和驾乘人员参数(安全带使用情况、涉及的车身部件、驾乘人员运动学、碰撞主要受力方向以及驾乘人员年龄)的骨折模式进行定性和定量比较。
本研究纳入了158名系安全带的驾乘人员和44名未系安全带的驾乘人员。对于系安全带的驾乘人员,骨折主要位于肩带路径附近,大多数骨折发生在胸部内侧(相对于车辆)。对于未系安全带的驾乘人员,骨折大致对称,分布在胸部两侧。正面(0°)和近侧(驾驶员为330°至350°;乘客为10°至30°)碰撞主要受力方向的驾乘人员之间,骨折模式差异可忽略不计,但考虑驾乘人员运动学(以及在车内的接触情况)时,不同组之间存在显著差异。年龄也会影响骨折模式,老年驾乘人员的骨折倾向于更靠前,而年轻驾乘人员(系安全带和未系安全带的)的骨折倾向于更靠外侧。
本研究结果通过现实世界数据证实,在配备了前部安全气囊的碰撞事故中,未系安全带的驾乘人员的肋骨骨折模式相比系安全带的驾乘人员,在胸部的分布更分散且更对称。其他因素,如驾乘人员运动学和驾乘人员年龄,也会产生不同的骨折模式。现实世界中驾乘人员肋骨骨折模式的标准数据有助于理解损伤机制以及不同致因因素的作用,最终有助于预防骨折并提高车辆安全性。