O'Hern Steve, Oxley Jennifer, Logan David
a Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC), Monash Injury Research Institute (MIRI), Monash University , Melbourne , Australia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S161-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061662.
Engaging in active transport modes (especially walking) is a healthy and environmentally friendly alternative to driving and may be particularly beneficial for older adults. However, older adults are a vulnerable group: they are at higher risk of injury compared with younger adults, mainly due to frailty and may be at increased risk of collision due to the effects of age on sensory, cognitive, and motor abilities. Moreover, our population is aging, and there is a trend for the current cohort of older adults to maintain mobility later in life compared with previous cohorts. Though these trends have serious implications for transport policy and safety, little is known about the contributing factors and injury outcomes of pedestrian collision. Further, previous research generally considers the older population as a homogeneous group and rarely considers the increased risks associated with continued ageing.
Collision characteristics and injury outcomes for 2 subgroups of older pedestrians (65-74 years and 75+ years) were examined by extracting data from the state police-reported crash dataset and hospital admission/emergency department presentation data over the 10-year period between 2003 and 2012. Variables identified for analysis included pedestrian characteristics (age, gender, activity, etc.), crash location and type, injury characteristics and severity, and duration of hospital stay. A spatial analysis of crash locations was also undertaken to identify collision clusters and the contribution of environmental features on collision and injury risk.
Adults over 65 years were involved in 21% of all pedestrian collisions. A high fatality rate was found among older adults, particularly for those aged 75 years and older: this group had 3.2 deaths per 100,000 population, compared to a rate of 1.3 for 65- to 74-year-olds and 0.7 for adults below 65 years of age. Older pedestrian injuries were most likely to occur while crossing the carriageway; they were also more likely to be injured in parking lots, at driveway intersections, and on sidewalks compared to younger cohorts. Spatial analyses revealed older pedestrian crash clusters on arterial roads in urban shopping precincts. Significantly higher rates of hospital admissions were found for pedestrians over the age of 75 years and for abdominal, head, and neck injuries; conversely, older adults were underrepresented in emergency department presentations (mainly lower and upper extremity injuries), suggesting an increased severity associated with older pedestrian injuries. Average length of hospital stay also increased with increasing age.
This analysis revealed age differences in collision risk and injury outcomes among older adults and that aggregate analysis of older pedestrians can distort the significance of risk factors associated with older pedestrian injuries. These findings have implications that extend to the development of engineering, behavioral, and enforcement countermeasures to address the problems faced by the oldest pedestrians and reduce collision risk and improve injury outcomes.
选择主动交通方式(尤其是步行)出行,相比于驾车,既健康又环保,对老年人可能尤其有益。然而,老年人是弱势群体:与年轻人相比,他们受伤的风险更高,主要是因为身体虚弱,而且由于年龄对感官、认知和运动能力的影响,他们遭遇碰撞的风险可能更高。此外,我们的人口正在老龄化,与前几代老年人相比,当前这一代老年人在晚年保持行动能力的趋势更加明显。尽管这些趋势对交通政策和安全有着重大影响,但对于行人碰撞的促成因素和受伤后果却知之甚少。此外,以往的研究通常将老年人群视为一个同质化群体,很少考虑到持续老龄化带来的风险增加。
通过从州警方报告的撞车数据集以及2003年至2012年这10年间的医院入院/急诊科就诊数据中提取数据,对两个老年行人亚组(65 - 74岁和75岁及以上)的碰撞特征和受伤后果进行了研究。确定用于分析的变量包括行人特征(年龄、性别、活动等)、撞车地点和类型、受伤特征和严重程度以及住院时间。还对撞车地点进行了空间分析,以确定碰撞聚集区以及环境特征对碰撞和受伤风险的影响。
65岁以上的成年人占所有行人碰撞事故的21%。在老年人中发现了较高的死亡率,特别是75岁及以上的人群:该群体每10万人口中有3.2人死亡,相比之下,65 - 74岁人群的死亡率为1.3,65岁以下成年人的死亡率为0.7。老年行人受伤最有可能发生在横穿车道时;与年轻人群相比,他们在停车场、车道交叉口和人行道上也更容易受伤。空间分析揭示了城市购物区主干道上存在老年行人碰撞聚集区。75岁以上的行人以及腹部、头部和颈部受伤的行人住院率明显更高;相反,在急诊科就诊的老年人较少(主要是下肢和上肢受伤),这表明老年行人受伤的严重程度更高。平均住院时间也随着年龄的增长而增加。
该分析揭示了老年人在碰撞风险和受伤后果方面的年龄差异,而且对老年行人的总体分析可能会歪曲与老年行人受伤相关的风险因素的重要性。这些发现对于制定工程、行为和执法方面的对策具有启示意义,以解决最年长行人面临的问题,降低碰撞风险并改善受伤后果。