• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reasons for Child Passenger Nonrestraint in Motor Vehicles.儿童在机动车中未使用乘客约束装置的原因。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2(0 2):S41-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1040115.
2
Motor Vehicle Crashes, Medical Outcomes, and Hospital Charges Among Children Aged 1-12 Years - Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System, 11 States, 2005-2008.1-12 岁儿童机动车事故、医疗结局和医院费用 - 事故结局数据评估系统,11 个州,2005-2008 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 2;64(8):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6408a1.
3
Child passenger safety practices in the U.S.: disparities in light of updated recommendations.美国儿童乘客安全实践:更新建议下的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.023.
4
Grandparents and child passenger safety.祖父母与儿童乘客安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
5
Observed use of tethers in forward-facing child restraint systems.观察到在正向儿童约束系统中使用安全带。
Inj Prev. 2011 Dec;17(6):371-4. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.030171. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
6
Keeping our children safe in motor vehicles: knowledge, attitudes and practice among parents in Kuwait regarding child car safety.保障儿童在机动车中的安全:科威特父母在儿童汽车安全方面的知识、态度和实践。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2013;20(4):358-67. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2012.745578. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Parental awareness and perception for correct use of child restraint systems and airbags in Brazil.巴西父母对正确使用儿童约束系统和安全气囊的认知与观念。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):171-174. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1232808. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Psychosocial factors related to parental restraint of pre-school children in motor vehicles.与父母对学龄前儿童在机动车内的约束相关的社会心理因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 1988 Apr;20(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(88)90023-1.
9
Effects of seating position and appropriate restraint use on the risk of injury to children in motor vehicle crashes.坐姿及正确使用约束装置对儿童在机动车碰撞事故中受伤风险的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e305-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1522.
10
Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to child safety restraint in citizens of Shenzhen Municipality, China, and the associations between these factors.中国深圳市市民对儿童安全约束的知识、态度和行为,以及这些因素之间的关联。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Jan 2;19(1):42-48. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1329534. Epub 2017 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of child restraint usage among Chinese parents.中国父母使用儿童安全座椅的预测因素。
J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Affordability and Availability of Child Restraints in an Under-Served Population in South Africa.南非服务不足人群中儿童约束装置的可负担性和可获得性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 17;17(6):1979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061979.
3
Child passenger fatality: Child restraint system usage and contributing factors among the youngest passengers from 2011 to 2015.儿童乘客死亡:2011 年至 2015 年期间年龄最小的乘客中,儿童约束系统的使用情况和相关因素。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Situational Use of Child Restraint Systems and Carpooling Behaviors in Parents and Caregivers.情境式使用儿童约束系统和拼车行为在父母和看护者中。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 20;15(8):1788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081788.

本文引用的文献

1
Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.时间折扣能解释不健康行为吗?一项系统综述及强化学习视角
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00076. eCollection 2014.
2
Disparities in age-appropriate child passenger restraint use among children aged 1 to 12 years.1 至 12 岁儿童使用符合年龄的儿童乘客约束装置的差异。
Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):262-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1908. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
3
Child passenger safety practices in the U.S.: disparities in light of updated recommendations.美国儿童乘客安全实践:更新建议下的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.023.
4
Are there racial disparities in the use of restraints and outcomes in children after motor vehicle crashes?在机动车事故后,儿童使用约束装置和结局方面是否存在种族差异?
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;47(6):1192-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.022.
5
Booster seat legislation: does it work for all children?增高座椅立法:它对所有儿童都有效吗?
Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;17(4):233-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.029835. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
6
Effectiveness of belt positioning booster seats: an updated assessment.安全带定位增高座椅的有效性:最新评估
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124(5):1281-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0908. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
7
Child passenger restraint use and emergency department--reported injuries: a special study using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program, 2004.儿童乘客约束装置的使用情况与急诊科报告的损伤:一项利用2004年国家电子伤害监测系统-全损伤项目开展的专项研究。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.10.007. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
8
Parent driver characteristics associated with sub-optimal restraint of child passengers.与儿童乘客约束不足相关的家长驾驶员特征。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;7(4):373-80. doi: 10.1080/15389580600789143.
9
Effectiveness of child safety seats vs seat belts in reducing risk for death in children in passenger vehicle crashes.儿童安全座椅与安全带在降低乘用车碰撞事故中儿童死亡风险方面的有效性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jun;160(6):617-21. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.6.617.
10
Racial differences in child safety restraint use in Tennessee.田纳西州儿童安全约束装置使用情况中的种族差异。
Inj Prev. 2005 Dec;11(6):340-2. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.008706.

儿童在机动车中未使用乘客约束装置的原因。

Reasons for Child Passenger Nonrestraint in Motor Vehicles.

作者信息

Zonfrillo Mark R, Ferguson Rennie W, Walker Lorrie

机构信息

a Center for Injury Research and Prevention and Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.

b Department of Pediatrics , Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2(0 2):S41-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1040115.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2015.1040115
PMID:26436241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4602401/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although child passenger restraint use in motor vehicles has increased, there is an important minority of children who remain unrestrained. The goal of this study was to identify the frequency of and under what circumstances parents keep their children unrestrained.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to parents and caregivers of children 10 years old and younger. Survey participants were asked about child restraint practices, including frequency of and reasons for nonuse of restraints. Parents were specifically asked how acceptable it would be to keep their child unrestrained in certain situations.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred eighty-five parents and guardians responded to the survey and 1,002 completed it; 23.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.3-26.6%) of respondents said they had driven with their child not fully restrained on at least one occasion. Approximately 1 in 5 parents strongly or somewhat agreed that it would be acceptable to keep their child unrestrained in certain situations, including a short drive, in a rush, an inadequate number of restraints, riding in a taxi, if somebody was holding the child, and as a reward for a child. Parents were more likely to agree that it was acceptable to keep their child unrestrained under nearly all circumstances listed if they were male, ages 18-29, with a graduate school education, in the $100,000+ income bracket, or Latino.

CONCLUSIONS

There are certain situations for which parents find it acceptable to leave their children unrestrained. This has implications for targeted child passenger safety efforts designed to maximize consistent restraint use.

摘要

目的

尽管儿童乘车时使用约束装置的情况有所增加,但仍有相当一部分儿童未受到约束。本研究的目的是确定父母让孩子不使用约束装置的频率以及在何种情况下会这样做。

方法

对10岁及以下儿童的父母和照料者进行了一项横断面在线调查。调查参与者被问及儿童约束措施的使用情况,包括不使用约束装置的频率和原因。特别询问了父母在某些情况下让孩子不使用约束装置的可接受程度。

结果

1285名父母和监护人回复了调查,1002人完成了调查;23.8%(95%置信区间[CI],21.3 - 26.6%)的受访者表示他们至少有一次开车时孩子未完全受到约束。约五分之一的父母强烈或 somewhat 同意在某些情况下让孩子不使用约束装置是可以接受的,这些情况包括短途驾驶、匆忙时、约束装置数量不足、乘坐出租车、有人抱着孩子以及作为对孩子的奖励。如果父母是男性、年龄在18 - 29岁、拥有研究生学历、收入在10万美元以上或为拉丁裔,他们更有可能同意在几乎所有列出的情况下让孩子不使用约束装置是可以接受的。

结论

父母发现在某些情况下让孩子不使用约束装置是可以接受的。这对旨在最大限度地提高约束装置持续使用率的针对性儿童乘客安全工作具有启示意义。