• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国父母使用儿童安全座椅的预测因素。

Predictors of child restraint usage among Chinese parents.

作者信息

Yang Yongyue, Su Fen, Ge Yating, Wang Huarong, Schwebel David C

机构信息

Department of Traffic Psychology, Institute of Special Environmental Medicine, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong, Jiangsu Province 226019, China.

Department of Traffic Psychology, Institute of Special Environmental Medicine, Nantong University, 9 Seyuan Road, Nantong, Jiangsu Province 226019, China.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.014
PMID:39998513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11862264/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate psychological predictors of the use of child restraints among Chinese parents following passage of national law requiring their use.

METHODS

Grounded in the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) and guidance from previous research, we developed and administered a questionnaire to assess child restraint usage and understand psychological factors that predict usage. 413 parents with child(ren) aged 0-8 years completed the questionnaire through the WenJuanXing online survey platform.

RESULTS

Among the 413 parents, 321 (77.7%) used child restraints regularly when taking their children on car trips, with the highest use reported among parents with children under 1 year (83.8%). Among the psychological predictors, willingness to use a restraint was the strongest predictor of intention and self-reported behavior to use restraints, but the predictive effect of intention on behavior was not significant. Descriptive norms - a belief that trusted friends and family use restraints - was the strongest predictor of behavior to use child restraints, and prototype favorability - the belief that prototypical parents of similar age and gender use restraints - also showed significant effects in predicting behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the passage of national laws requiring child restraints in China, it is becoming more common for parents to use restraints when their children travel by car. Parents' use of child restraints for children follows a socially reactive (through willingness) decision-making path rather than a reasoned (through intention) decision-making pattern. The influence of the behavior of others, both trusted friends and family (descriptive norms) and prototypical similar parents (prototype favorability) are strong predictive factors for use of child restraints, suggesting prevention programs might leverage behavior of others to impact parents and encourage use of child restraints.

摘要

目的

在中国通过要求使用儿童安全约束装置的国家法律后,调查中国父母使用儿童安全约束装置的心理预测因素。

方法

基于原型意愿模型(PWM)并借鉴以往研究的指导,我们编制并发放了一份问卷,以评估儿童安全约束装置的使用情况,并了解预测使用情况的心理因素。413名有0至8岁孩子的父母通过问卷星在线调查平台完成了问卷。

结果

在413名父母中,321名(77.7%)在带孩子乘车出行时经常使用儿童安全约束装置,其中1岁以下孩子的父母使用率最高(83.8%)。在心理预测因素中,使用安全约束装置的意愿是使用安全约束装置意图和自我报告行为的最强预测因素,但意图对行为的预测作用不显著。描述性规范——相信可信赖的朋友和家人使用安全约束装置——是使用儿童安全约束装置行为的最强预测因素,原型偏好——相信年龄和性别相似的典型父母使用安全约束装置——在预测行为方面也显示出显著影响。

结论

在中国通过要求使用儿童安全约束装置的国家法律后,父母在孩子乘车时使用安全约束装置的情况越来越普遍。父母对孩子使用儿童安全约束装置遵循社会反应性(通过意愿)决策路径,而非理性(通过意图)决策模式。他人的行为,即可信赖的朋友和家人(描述性规范)以及典型的相似父母(原型偏好)的影响,是使用儿童安全约束装置的强有力预测因素,这表明预防项目可能会利用他人的行为来影响父母并鼓励使用儿童安全约束装置。

相似文献

1
Predictors of child restraint usage among Chinese parents.中国父母使用儿童安全座椅的预测因素。
J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Designing and evaluating a persuasive child restraint television commercial.设计并评估一个有说服力的儿童安全座椅电视广告。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(3):271-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1072626. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
3
Parents' experience with child safety restraint in China.中国父母使用儿童安全约束装置的经历。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 7;14:318. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-318.
4
Car seat survey at a children's hospital: need a booster?一家儿童医院的汽车座椅调查:需要增高坐垫吗?
N Z Med J. 2019 Aug 16;132(1500):59-69.
5
Using interactive virtual presence to support accurate installation of child restraints: Efficacy and parental perceptions.使用交互式虚拟技术支持儿童安全座椅的正确安装:效果及家长认知
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Sociocultural-psychological predictors influencing parents' decision-making regarding HPV vaccination for their adolescent daughters in mainland China: An extended TPB model.影响中国大陆父母为其青春期女儿接种 HPV 疫苗决策的社会文化心理预测因素:TPB 模型的扩展。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1035658. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035658. eCollection 2022.
7
The use of car safety seats for children in China: A questionnaire survey based on the theory of planned behavior.中国儿童汽车安全座椅使用情况:基于计划行为理论的问卷调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(5):414-422. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2193279. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
8
Parents' knowledge, attitude, and use of child restraints, Shantou, China.中国汕头地区父母对儿童约束装置的认知、态度和使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.017.
9
An exploratory study of parents' use and knowledge of car safety seats in Beijing, China.中国北京地区父母使用和了解汽车安全座椅的探索性研究。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2010 Dec;17(4):231-8. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2010.487155.
10
Buckle up safely (shoalhaven): a process and impact evaluation of a pragmatic, multifaceted preschool-based pilot program to increase correct use of age-appropriate child restraints.安全扣紧(肖尔黑文):一项实用、多方面的基于学龄前儿童的试点计划的过程和影响评估,以增加正确使用适合年龄的儿童约束装置。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(5):483-90. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.833328.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile phone use while cycling among e-bikers in China: Reasoned or social reactive?中国电动自行车骑行者骑车时使用手机:理性还是社会反应?
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Observed relationships between driver and passenger restraint use in the front and rear seats.观察到驾驶员和乘客在前排和后排座位上的约束使用之间的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(6):352-357. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2077931. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
Mobile device use while crossing the street: Utilizing the theory of planned behavior.行人过街道时使用移动设备:利用计划行为理论。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jun;127:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
4
Psychological predictors of mobile phone use while crossing the street among college students: An application of the theory of planned behavior.大学生过马路时使用手机的心理预测因素:计划行为理论的应用
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):118-123. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1236195. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
5
The theory of planned behavior (TPB) and texting while driving behavior in college students.大学生的计划行为理论(TPB)与边开车边发短信行为
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Jan 2;18(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1172703. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
6
Boosting safety behaviour: Descriptive norms encourage child booster seat usage amongst low involvement parents.提高安全行为:描述性规范鼓励低参与度父母使用儿童增高座椅。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
Reasoned versus reactive prediction of behaviour: a meta-analysis of the prototype willingness model.理性预测与反应性预测行为:原型意愿模型的荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.922895. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
8
Reasons for Child Passenger Nonrestraint in Motor Vehicles.儿童在机动车中未使用乘客约束装置的原因。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2(0 2):S41-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1040115.
9
An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict pedestrians' violating crossing behavior using structural equation modeling.运用结构方程建模,对计划行为理论加以扩展,以预测行人闯红灯行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Concealing their communication: exploring psychosocial predictors of young drivers' intentions and engagement in concealed texting.隐瞒通讯:探究年轻驾驶员隐瞒发短信意图和行为的心理社会预测因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 22.