Davidson Richard J, Kaszniak Alfred W
Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry and the Center for Investigating Healthy Minds-Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Departments of Psychology, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
Am Psychol. 2015 Oct;70(7):581-92. doi: 10.1037/a0039512.
Both basic science and clinical research on mindfulness, meditation, and related constructs have dramatically increased in recent years. However, interpretation of these research results has been challenging. The present article addresses unique conceptual and methodological problems posed by research in this area. Included among the key topics is the role of first-person experience and how it can be best studied, the challenges posed by intervention research designs in which true double-blinding is not possible, the nature of control and comparison conditions for research that includes mindfulness or other meditation-based interventions, issues in the adequate description of mindfulness and related trainings and interventions, the question of how mindfulness can be measured, questions regarding what can and cannot be inferred from self-report measures, and considerations regarding the structure of study design and data analyses. Most of these topics are germane to both basic and clinical research studies and have important bearing on the future scientific understanding of mindfulness and meditation.
近年来,关于正念、冥想及相关概念的基础科学研究和临床研究都显著增加。然而,对这些研究结果的解读一直具有挑战性。本文探讨了该领域研究中所提出的独特概念和方法问题。关键主题包括第一人称体验的作用以及如何对其进行最佳研究、无法实现真正双盲的干预研究设计所带来的挑战、包含正念或其他基于冥想的干预措施的研究中对照和比较条件的性质、正念及相关训练与干预措施的充分描述问题、正念如何测量的问题、关于自我报告测量可推断和不可推断内容的问题,以及关于研究设计结构和数据分析的考量。这些主题中的大多数与基础研究和临床研究都密切相关,并且对未来正念和冥想的科学理解具有重要影响。