Payne Matthew S, Cullinane Meabh, Garland Suzanne M, Tabrizi Sepehr N, Donath Susan M, Bennett Catherine M, Amir Lisa H
Judith Lumley Centre (formerly Mother & Child Health Research), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Women's Centre for Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;56(2):179-84. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12409. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Most studies describing vaginal Candida spp. in pregnancy focus on symptomatic vaginitis, rather than asymptomatic colonisation, and solely utilise microbiological culture. The extent to which asymptomatic vaginal carriage may represent a reservoir for infant oral colonisation has been highly debated.
This study formed part of the Candida and Staphylococcus Transmission Longitudinal Evaluation (CASTLE) study, in Melbourne, Australia, from 2009 to 2011 and used culture and molecular methods to examine vaginal swabs collected late in the third trimester of pregnancy for Candida spp. Oral swabs from infants were also examined using culture methods.
Overall, 80 of 356 (22%) women were positive for Candida spp; the majority being Candida albicans (83%). Candida glabrata and other Candida spp. were also identified, but in much lower numbers. Molecular analysis identified numerous positive samples not detected by culture, including 13 cases of C. albicans. In addition, some positive samples only recorded to genus level by culture were accurately identified as either C. albicans or C. glabrata following molecular analyses. Eighteen infants recorded positive Candida spp. cultures, predominantly C. albicans. However, there were only four (25%) mother/infant dyads where C. albicans was detected.
This study provides valuable data on asymptomatic colonisation rates of Candida spp. within an asymptomatic population of women late in pregnancy. The utilisation of molecular methods improved the rate of detection and provided a more accurate means for identification of non-albicans Candida spp. The low mother/infant colonisation rate suggests that non-maternal sources are likely involved in determining infant oral colonisation status.
大多数描述孕期阴道念珠菌属的研究都集中在有症状的阴道炎上,而非无症状定植,且仅采用微生物培养法。无症状阴道携带在多大程度上可能是婴儿口腔定植的一个来源一直存在激烈争论。
本研究是澳大利亚墨尔本2009年至2011年念珠菌与葡萄球菌传播纵向评估(CASTLE)研究的一部分,采用培养和分子方法检测妊娠晚期采集的阴道拭子中的念珠菌属。还使用培养方法检测婴儿的口腔拭子。
总体而言,356名女性中有80名(22%)念珠菌属检测呈阳性;大多数为白色念珠菌(83%)。光滑念珠菌和其他念珠菌属也有发现,但数量少得多。分子分析鉴定出许多培养法未检测到的阳性样本,包括13例白色念珠菌。此外,一些培养法仅记录到属水平的阳性样本,经分子分析后准确鉴定为白色念珠菌或光滑念珠菌。18名婴儿念珠菌属培养呈阳性,主要为白色念珠菌。然而,仅4对(25%)母婴检测到白色念珠菌。
本研究提供了关于妊娠晚期无症状女性群体中念珠菌属无症状定植率的宝贵数据。分子方法的使用提高了检测率,并为鉴定非白色念珠菌属提供了更准确的手段。母婴定植率低表明非母体来源可能参与了婴儿口腔定植状态的确定。