ACRI-HE, 260 route du Pin Montard, BP 234, 06904 Sophia Antipolis cedex, France.
ENEA (Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), 76, Lungotevere Thaon de Revel, Rome, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;541:729-741. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.113. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
Southern forests are at the highest ozone (O3) risk in Europe where ground-level O3 is a pressing sanitary problem for ecosystem health. Exposure-based standards for protecting vegetation are not representative of actual field conditions. A biologically-sound stomatal flux-based standard has been proposed, although critical levels for protection still need to be validated. This innovative epidemiological assessment of forest responses to O3 was carried out in 54 plots in Southeastern France and Northwestern Italy in 2012 and 2013. Three O3 indices, namely the accumulated exposure AOT40, and the accumulated stomatal flux with and without an hourly threshold of uptake (POD1 and POD0) were compared. Stomatal O3 fluxes were modeled (DO3SE) and correlated to measured forest-response indicators, i.e. crown defoliation, crown discoloration and visible foliar O3 injury. Soil water content, a key variable affecting the severity of visible foliar O3 injury, was included in DO3SE. Based on flux-effect relationships, we developed species-specific flux-based critical levels (CLef) for forest protection against visible O3 injury. For O3 sensitive conifers, CLef of 19 mmol m(-2) for Pinus cembra (high O3 sensitivity) and 32 mmol m(-2) for Pinus halepensis (moderate O3 sensitivity) were calculated. For broadleaved species, we obtained a CLef of 25 mmol m(-2) for Fagus sylvatica (moderate O3 sensitivity) and of 19 mmol m(-2) for Fraxinus excelsior (high O3 sensitivity). We showed that an assessment based on PODY and on real plant symptoms is more appropriated than the concentration-based method. Indeed, POD0 was better correlated with visible foliar O3 injury than AOT40, whereas AOT40 was better correlated with crown discoloration and defoliation (aspecific indicators). To avoid an underestimation of the real O3 uptake, we recommend the use of POD0 calculated for hours with a non-null global radiation over the 24-h O3 accumulation window.
南方森林处于欧洲臭氧(O3)风险最高的地区,那里的地面 O3 是生态系统健康的紧迫卫生问题。保护植被的基于暴露的标准不能代表实际的田间条件。虽然已经提出了基于生物合理性的气孔流的标准,但仍需要验证保护的临界水平。这项针对森林对 O3 反应的创新流行病学评估是在 2012 年和 2013 年在法国东南部和意大利西北部的 54 个地块进行的。比较了三个 O3 指数,即累积暴露 AOT40,以及有和没有每小时吸收阈值(POD1 和 POD0)的累积气孔流。模拟了气孔 O3 通量(DO3SE)并将其与测量的森林响应指标(即树冠落叶、树冠变色和可见叶 O3 损伤)相关联。土壤水分是影响可见叶 O3 损伤严重程度的关键变量,包含在 DO3SE 中。基于通量效应关系,我们为保护森林免受可见 O3 损伤制定了特定物种的基于通量的临界水平(CLef)。对于 O3 敏感的针叶树,Pinaceae 物种中,Pinus cembra(高 O3 敏感性)的 CLef 为 19 mmol m(-2),Pinus halepensis(中 O3 敏感性)的 CLef 为 32 mmol m(-2)。对于阔叶树种,我们获得了 Fagaceae 物种中 Fagus sylvatica(中 O3 敏感性)的 CLef 为 25 mmol m(-2)和 Fraxinus excelsior(高 O3 敏感性)的 CLef 为 19 mmol m(-2)。我们表明,基于 PODY 和实际植物症状的评估比基于浓度的方法更合适。事实上,POD0 与可见叶 O3 损伤的相关性优于 AOT40,而 AOT40 与树冠变色和落叶(非特异性指标)的相关性更好。为了避免对实际 O3 吸收的低估,我们建议在 24 小时 O3 积累窗口内使用非零总辐射的小时计算 POD0。