CNR, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
CREA - Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, Viale S. Margherita 80, 52100 Arezzo, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 15;691:516-527. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.525. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
European standards for the protection of forests from ozone (O) are based on atmospheric exposure (AOT40) that is not always representative of O effects since it is not a proxy of gas uptake through stomata (stomatal flux). MOTTLES "MOnitoring ozone injury for seTTing new critical LEvelS" is a LIFE project aimed at establishing a permanent network of forest sites based on active O monitoring at remote areas at high and medium risk of O injury, in order to define new standards based on stomatal flux, i.e. POD (Phytotoxic Ozone Dose above a threshold Y of uptake). Based on the first year of data collected at MOTTLES sites, we describe the MOTTLES monitoring station, together with protocols and metric calculation methods. AOT40 and POD, computed with different methods, are then compared and correlated with forest-health indicators (radial growth, crown defoliation, visible foliar O injury). For the year 2017, the average AOT40 calculated according to the European Directive was even 5 times (on average 1.7 times) the European legislative standard for the protection of forests. When the metrics were calculated according to the European protocols (EU Directive 2008/50/EC or Modelling and Mapping Manual LTRAP Convention), the values were well correlated to those obtained on the basis of the real duration of the growing season (i.e. MOTTLES method) and were thus representative of the actual exposure/flux. AOT40 showed opposite direction relative to PODY. Visible foliar O injury appeared as the best forest-health indicator for O under field conditions and was more frequently detected at forest edge than inside the forest. The present work may help the set-up of further long-term forest monitoring sites dedicated to O assessment in forests, especially because flux-based assessments are recommended as part of monitoring air pollution impacts on ecosystems in the revised EU National Emissions Ceilings Directive.
欧洲保护森林免受臭氧(O)的标准基于大气暴露(AOT40),但由于它不是通过气孔(气孔通量)吸收气体的替代物,因此并不总是代表 O 的影响。MOTTLES“为确定新的临界水平监测臭氧损伤”是一个 LIFE 项目,旨在基于高风险和中风险地区的远程主动 O 监测,建立一个基于气孔通量的永久性森林监测站点网络,以确定基于气孔通量的新标准,即 POD(超过阈值 Y 的吸收量的有害臭氧剂量)。基于 MOTTLES 站点第一年收集的数据,我们描述了 MOTTLES 监测站,以及协议和指标计算方法。然后比较了不同方法计算的 AOT40 和 POD,并将其与森林健康指标(径向生长、树冠落叶、可见叶片 O 损伤)相关联。在 2017 年,根据欧洲指令计算的平均 AOT40 甚至是欧洲森林保护立法标准的 5 倍(平均为 1.7 倍)。当根据欧洲协议(欧洲指令 2008/50/EC 或建模和绘图手册 LTRAP 公约)计算指标时,这些值与根据实际生长季节持续时间(即 MOTTLES 方法)获得的值很好地相关,因此代表了实际的暴露/通量。AOT40 与 PODY 呈相反方向。可见叶片 O 损伤在野外条件下是 O 对森林健康影响的最佳指标,在森林边缘比在森林内部更频繁地检测到。本工作可能有助于建立更多专门用于评估森林 O 状况的长期森林监测站点,特别是因为在修订后的欧盟国家排放上限指令中,建议对基于通量的评估进行监测,以评估空气污染对生态系统的影响。