Anav Alessandro, De Marco Alessandra, Proietti Chiara, Alessandri Andrea, Dell'Aquila Alessandro, Cionni Irene, Friedlingstein Pierre, Khvorostyanov Dmitry, Menut Laurent, Paoletti Elena, Sicard Pierre, Sitch Stephen, Vitale Marcello
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Laver Building, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK.
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment (ENEA), C.R. Casaccia, S. Maria di Galeria, Rome, 00123, Italy.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Apr;22(4):1608-27. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13138. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
Tropospheric ozone (O3) produces harmful effects to forests and crops, leading to a reduction of land carbon assimilation that, consequently, influences the land sink and the crop yield production. To assess the potential negative O3 impacts to vegetation, the European Union uses the Accumulated Ozone over Threshold of 40 ppb (AOT40). This index has been chosen for its simplicity and flexibility in handling different ecosystems as well as for its linear relationships with yield or biomass loss. However, AOT40 does not give any information on the physiological O3 uptake into the leaves since it does not include any environmental constraints to O3 uptake through stomata. Therefore, an index based on stomatal O3 uptake (i.e. PODY), which describes the amount of O3 entering into the leaves, would be more appropriate. Specifically, the PODY metric considers the effects of multiple climatic factors, vegetation characteristics and local and phenological inputs rather than the only atmospheric O3 concentration. For this reason, the use of PODY in the O3 risk assessment for vegetation is becoming recommended. We compare different potential O3 risk assessments based on two methodologies (i.e. AOT40 and stomatal O3 uptake) using a framework of mesoscale models that produces hourly meteorological and O3 data at high spatial resolution (12 km) over Europe for the time period 2000-2005. Results indicate a remarkable spatial and temporal inconsistency between the two indices, suggesting that a new definition of European legislative standard is needed in the near future. Besides, our risk assessment based on AOT40 shows a good consistency compared to both in-situ data and other model-based datasets. Conversely, risk assessment based on stomatal O3 uptake shows different spatial patterns compared to other model-based datasets. This strong inconsistency can be likely related to a different vegetation cover and its associated parameterizations.
对流层臭氧(O₃)会对森林和农作物产生有害影响,导致陆地碳同化作用减弱,进而影响陆地碳汇和农作物产量。为评估臭氧对植被的潜在负面影响,欧盟采用了40 ppb 阈值以上累积臭氧(AOT40)这一指标。选择该指标是因其在处理不同生态系统时具有简单性和灵活性,以及与产量或生物量损失的线性关系。然而,AOT40并未提供任何关于叶片对臭氧生理吸收的信息,因为它没有纳入任何通过气孔吸收臭氧的环境限制因素。因此,基于气孔臭氧吸收量(即PODY)的指标会更合适,该指标描述了进入叶片的臭氧量。具体而言,PODY指标考虑了多种气候因素、植被特征以及当地和物候输入的影响,而非仅考虑大气臭氧浓度。出于这个原因,在植被臭氧风险评估中使用PODY正受到推荐。我们使用一个中尺度模型框架,比较基于两种方法(即AOT40和气孔臭氧吸收量)的不同潜在臭氧风险评估,该模型框架在2000 - 2005年期间为欧洲生成高空间分辨率(12公里)的每小时气象和臭氧数据。结果表明这两个指标在空间和时间上存在显著不一致,这表明在不久的将来需要对欧洲立法标准进行重新定义。此外,我们基于AOT40的风险评估与现场数据以及其他基于模型的数据集相比显示出良好的一致性。相反,基于气孔臭氧吸收量的风险评估与其他基于模型的数据集相比呈现出不同的空间模式。这种强烈的不一致很可能与不同的植被覆盖及其相关参数化有关。