Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Ashworth Laboratories, Charlotte Auerbach Road, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov;30(11):641-648. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
The concept of ecosystem services (ES) neatly encapsulates the ways in which human society depends upon the existence and functioning of nature, but also draws power by chiming with dominant neoliberal ideology. Scientific paradigms such as this have an inherent tendency to stop adherents from recognizing alternative approaches. It is high time to examine whether the concept is being oversold with potentially damaging consequences. Many authors have questioned the monetization of ES, but the origin of the problem lies deeper in anthropocentrism. By illustration with alternatives, I attempt to show how the ES paradigm has constrained thought, particularly towards the monetization and financialization of nature, even when many ecologists and others oppose this trend.
生态系统服务(ES)的概念巧妙地概括了人类社会对自然存在和功能的依赖方式,但也通过与主导的新自由主义意识形态产生共鸣而获得了影响力。这种科学范式有一种内在的趋势,使信徒无法认识到替代方法。现在是时候审视一下这个概念是否被过度推销了,因为它可能会带来潜在的破坏性后果。许多作者都对 ES 的货币化提出了质疑,但问题的根源更深层次在于人类中心主义。通过替代方案的例证,我试图展示 ES 范式是如何限制了人们的思维,特别是在自然的货币化和金融化方面,即使许多生态学家和其他人反对这一趋势。