Selck Henriette, Adamsen Peter B, Backhaus Thomas, Banta Gary T, Bruce Peter K H, Burton G Allen, Butts Michael B, Boegh Eva, Clague John J, Dinh Khuong V, Doorn Neelke, Gunnarsson Jonas S, Hauggaard-Nielsen Henrik, Hazlerigg Charles, Hunka Agnieszka D, Jensen John, Lin Yan, Loureiro Susana, Miraglia Simona, Munns Wayne R, Nadim Farrokh, Palmqvist Annemette, Rämö Robert A, Seaby Lauren P, Syberg Kristian, Tangaa Stine R, Thit Amalie, Windfeld Ronja, Zalewski Maciej, Chapman Peter M
Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Ramboll Environ, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Jan;36(1):7-16. doi: 10.1002/etc.3513.
Roskilde University (Denmark) hosted a November 2015 workshop, Environmental Risk-Assessing and Managing Multiple Risks in a Changing World. This Focus article presents the consensus recommendations of 30 attendees from 9 countries regarding implementation of a common currency (ecosystem services) for holistic environmental risk assessment and management; improvements to risk assessment and management in a complex, human-modified, and changing world; appropriate development of protection goals in a 2-stage process; dealing with societal issues; risk-management information needs; conducting risk assessment of risk management; and development of adaptive and flexible regulatory systems. The authors encourage both cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to address their 10 recommendations: 1) adopt ecosystem services as a common currency for risk assessment and management; 2) consider cumulative stressors (chemical and nonchemical) and determine which dominate to best manage and restore ecosystem services; 3) fully integrate risk managers and communities of interest into the risk-assessment process; 4) fully integrate risk assessors and communities of interest into the risk-management process; 5) consider socioeconomics and increased transparency in both risk assessment and risk management; 6) recognize the ethical rights of humans and ecosystems to an adequate level of protection; 7) determine relevant reference conditions and the proper ecological context for assessments in human-modified systems; 8) assess risks and benefits to humans and the ecosystem and consider unintended consequences of management actions; 9) avoid excessive conservatism or possible underprotection resulting from sole reliance on binary, numerical benchmarks; and 10) develop adaptive risk-management and regulatory goals based on ranges of uncertainty. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:7-16. © 2016 SETAC.
丹麦罗斯基勒大学于2015年11月举办了一场研讨会,主题为“在不断变化的世界中对多种环境风险进行评估与管理”。这篇焦点文章介绍了来自9个国家的30名与会者就采用通用货币(生态系统服务)进行整体环境风险评估与管理、在复杂、人类改造且不断变化的世界中改进风险评估与管理、分两阶段适当制定保护目标、处理社会问题、风险管理的信息需求、对风险管理进行风险评估以及开发适应性和灵活性监管系统等方面达成的共识性建议。作者鼓励采用跨学科和多学科方法来落实他们的10条建议:1)采用生态系统服务作为风险评估与管理的通用货币;2)考虑累积性压力源(化学和非化学的),并确定哪些压力源占主导地位,以便更好地管理和恢复生态系统服务;3)将风险管理者和相关利益群体充分纳入风险评估过程;4)将风险评估者和相关利益群体充分纳入风险管理过程;5)在风险评估和风险管理中考虑社会经济学因素并提高透明度;6)承认人类和生态系统享有获得充分保护水平的道德权利;7)确定人类改造系统中评估的相关参考条件和适当生态背景;8)评估对人类和生态系统的风险与益处,并考虑管理行动的意外后果;9)避免因单纯依赖二元数值基准而导致过度保守或可能的保护不足;10)基于不确定性范围制定适应性风险管理和监管目标。《环境毒理学与化学》2017年;36:7 - 16。© 2016 SETAC。