López-Fabal Ma Fátima, Gómez-Garcés José Luís, López-Hontangas José Luís, Sanz Nuria, Muñoz Carmen, Regodón Marta
José Luís Gómez-Garcés, Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital Universitario de Móstoles. C/ Rio Júcar s/n. 28935-Mostoles (Madrid), Spain.
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Oct;28(5):242-6.
Mass spectrometry has become a reference resource for identifying microorganisms in clinical microbiology services. One hundred and fifty one clinical isolates were selected from respiratory specimens routinely identified as Streptococcus pneumoniae (43), Haemophilus influenzae (64) and Moraxella catarrhalis (44). These identifications were compared with other phenotypical methods and mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS Vitek). Result discrepancies were assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Thirty-eight of the 43 strains of S. pneumoniae (86%) were identified as such using phenotypical methods and spectrometry. In 5 cases, MALDI-TOF identified 4 of them as Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae and 1 as S. mitis/oralis. Forty-eight of the 64 strains were identified as H. influenzae (75%) using biochemical identification systems and automated identification systems, whereas MALDI-TOF-MS Vitek identified 51 strains (79%) as such. Conventional methods and spectrometry identified all the 40 strains tested (100%) as M. catarrhalis. All strains with discrepant results were sequenced, and in all cases, the identification obtained by spectrometry was confirmed. The results obtained in this study show that mass spectrometry provides identification of these bacteria faster and in a more reliable way than those based on conventional phenotypical methods.
质谱分析法已成为临床微生物学服务中鉴定微生物的参考资源。从呼吸道标本中选取了151株临床分离株,这些标本通常被鉴定为肺炎链球菌(43株)、流感嗜血杆菌(64株)和卡他莫拉菌(44株)。将这些鉴定结果与其他表型方法和质谱分析法(基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱仪Vitek)进行比较。通过16S rRNA测序评估结果差异。43株肺炎链球菌中有38株(86%)通过表型方法和光谱法被鉴定为此类。在5例中,基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱仪将其中4株鉴定为拟肺炎链球菌,1株鉴定为缓症链球菌/口腔链球菌。64株菌株中有48株(75%)使用生化鉴定系统和自动鉴定系统被鉴定为流感嗜血杆菌,而基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱仪Vitek将51株(79%)鉴定为此类。传统方法和光谱法将所有40株受试菌株(100%)鉴定为卡他莫拉菌。对所有结果有差异的菌株进行测序,在所有情况下,光谱法获得的鉴定结果均得到证实。本研究获得的结果表明,与基于传统表型方法的鉴定相比,质谱分析法能更快、更可靠地鉴定这些细菌。