Laboratory for Structural NMR Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Mar;65(3):750-5. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22651. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
Pulse-wave velocity is an index of arterial stiffness, which is a strong indicator of cardiovascular risk. We present a high-speed technique that generates time-resolved complex difference signal intensity simultaneously in the ascending and descending aorta from velocity-encoded projections without gating, allowing quantification of pulse-wave velocity. The velocity-time curve was approximated with a time-resolved complex difference signal intensity to estimate the propagation time of the pulse wave in the aortic arch. The path length of the pulse wave is measured from an oblique sagittal image in a plane encompassing thoracic ascending and descending aorta, and pulse-wave velocity is computed from the ratio between the path length and pulse-wave propagation time. The method was implemented at 1.5 T and 3 T, and pulse-wave velocity was quantified in healthy subjects (ages 20-70 years, N=23) without symptoms or prior history of cardiovascular events. In addition, the method was compared against retrospectively EKG-gated PC-MRI. The overall results were found to be in good agreement with literature data showing age-related increase in aortic stiffness. The RMS differences between the projection and gated PC-MRI methods were less than 4%. Key benefits of the proposed method are simplicity in both data acquisition and processing requiring only computation of the complex difference between the velocity-encoded projections rather than absolute velocity.
脉搏波速度是动脉僵硬度的一个指标,是心血管风险的一个强有力的指标。我们提出了一种高速技术,它可以在没有门控的情况下从速度编码投影中同时生成升主动脉和降主动脉的时分辨差分信号强度,从而定量脉搏波速度。通过时分辨差分信号强度来近似速度时间曲线,以估计脉冲波在主动脉弓中的传播时间。脉冲波的路径长度是从包含胸升主动脉和降主动脉的斜矢状图像的平面中测量的,脉搏波速度是通过路径长度与脉搏波传播时间的比值计算得出的。该方法在 1.5T 和 3T 下实现,并在无心血管症状或既往病史的健康受试者(年龄 20-70 岁,N=23)中定量了脉搏波速度。此外,该方法与回顾性 ECG 门控 PC-MRI 进行了比较。总体结果与文献数据一致,表明主动脉僵硬度随年龄增长而增加。投影和门控 PC-MRI 方法之间的 RMS 差异小于 4%。该方法的主要优点是数据采集和处理简单,只需要计算速度编码投影之间的复差分,而不需要绝对速度。