Westermann Claudia, Peters Claudia, Lisiak Birgitte, Lamberti Monica, Nienhaus Albert
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, Hamburg, Germany.
Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Dec;72(12):880-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102879. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of viral hepatitis C (HCV) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) compared to the general population. A systematic search for the years 1989-2014 was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies on hepatitis C in HCWs were included if they incorporated either a control group or reference data for the general population. The study quality was classified as high, moderate or low. Pooled effect estimates were calculated to determine the odds of occupational infection. Heterogeneity between studies was analysed using the χ(2) test (p<0.10) and quantified using the I(2) test. 57 studies met our criteria for inclusion and 44 were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of high and moderate quality studies showed a significantly increased OR for HCV infection in HCWs relative to control populations, with a value of 1.6 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.42). Stratification by study region gave an OR of 2.1 in low prevalence countries; while stratification by occupational groups gave an increased prevalence for medical (OR 2.2) and for laboratory staff (OR 2.2). The OR for professionals at high risk of blood contact was 2.7. The pooled analysis indicates that the prevalence of infection is significantly higher in HCWs than in the general population. The highest prevalence was observed among medical and laboratory staff. Prospective studies that focus on HCW-specific activity and personal risk factors for HCV infection are needed.
本研究旨在评估医护人员中丙型病毒性肝炎(HCV)感染的患病率,并与普通人群进行比较。我们在1989年至2014年期间对Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了系统检索。纳入的关于医护人员丙型肝炎的研究需包含对照组或普通人群的参考数据。研究质量分为高、中、低三个等级。计算合并效应估计值以确定职业感染的几率。使用χ(2)检验(p<0.10)分析研究间的异质性,并使用I(2)检验进行量化。57项研究符合纳入标准,44项被纳入荟萃分析。对高质量和中等质量研究的分析表明,医护人员中HCV感染的比值比(OR)相对于对照组显著增加,值为1.6(95%置信区间1.03至2.42)。按研究地区分层,在低流行率国家OR为2.1;按职业组分层,医疗人员(OR 2.2)和实验室工作人员(OR 2.2)的患病率增加。血液接触高风险专业人员的OR为2.7。汇总分析表明,医护人员中的感染患病率显著高于普通人群。医疗和实验室工作人员的患病率最高。需要开展关注医护人员特定活动及HCV感染个人风险因素的前瞻性研究。