Lee Michael S Y, Palci Alessandro
Earth Sciences Section, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Earth Sciences Section, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):R922-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.009.
Evolutionary trees underpin virtually all of biology, and the wealth of new genomic data has enabled us to reconstruct them with increasing detail and confidence. While phenotypic (typically morphological) traits are becoming less important in reconstructing evolutionary trees, they still serve vital and unique roles in phylogenetics, even for living taxa for which vast amounts of genetic information are available. Morphology remains a powerful independent source of evidence for testing molecular clades, and - through fossil phenotypes - the primary means for time-scaling phylogenies. Morphological phylogenetics is therefore vital for transforming undated molecular topologies into dated evolutionary trees. However, if morphology is to be employed to its full potential, biologists need to start scrutinising phenotypes in a more objective fashion, models of phenotypic evolution need to be improved, and approaches for analysing phenotypic traits and fossils together with genomic data need to be refined.
进化树几乎支撑着所有生物学领域,丰富的新基因组数据使我们能够越来越详细且自信地重建进化树。虽然表型(通常是形态学)特征在重建进化树中的重要性正逐渐降低,但它们在系统发育学中仍起着至关重要且独特的作用,即使对于那些拥有大量遗传信息的现存分类群也是如此。形态学仍然是检验分子分支的强大独立证据来源,并且——通过化石表型——是对系统发育进行时间尺度标定的主要手段。因此,形态学系统发育学对于将未标定时间的分子拓扑结构转化为标定时间的进化树至关重要。然而,如果要充分发挥形态学的潜力,生物学家需要开始以更客观的方式审视表型,需要改进表型进化模型,并且需要完善将表型特征和化石与基因组数据一起进行分析的方法。