MacFarlane Peter, Anderson Timothy, McClintock Andrew S
a Department of Psychology , Ohio University , Athens , OH , USA.
Psychother Res. 2017 Mar;27(2):227-238. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1090038. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
Although empathy is one of most robust predictors of client outcome, there is little consensus about how best to conceptualize this construct.
The aim of the present research was to investigate clients' perceptions and in-session experiences of empathy.
Semi-structured, video-assisted interpersonal process recall interviews were used to collect data from nine clients receiving individual psychotherapy at a university psychology clinic.
Grounded theory analysis yielded a model consisting of three clusters: (1) relational context of empathy (i.e., personal relationship and professional relationship), (2) types of empathy (i.e., psychotherapists' cognitive empathy, psychotherapists' emotional empathy, and client attunement to psychotherapist), and (3) utility of empathy (i.e., process-related benefits and client-related benefits).
These results suggest that empathy is a multi-dimensional, interactional process that affects-and is affected by-the broader relationship between client and psychotherapist.
尽管共情是来访者治疗效果最有力的预测因素之一,但对于如何最好地概念化这一结构却几乎没有共识。
本研究的目的是调查来访者对共情的认知以及在治疗过程中的体验。
采用半结构化、视频辅助的人际过程回忆访谈,从一所大学心理诊所接受个体心理治疗的9名来访者中收集数据。
扎根理论分析得出一个由三个集群组成的模型:(1)共情的关系背景(即个人关系和专业关系),(2)共情的类型(即心理治疗师的认知共情、心理治疗师的情感共情以及来访者对心理治疗师的共鸣),以及(3)共情的效用(即与过程相关的益处和与来访者相关的益处)。
这些结果表明,共情是一个多维的、互动的过程,它影响着来访者与心理治疗师之间更广泛的关系,并受其影响。