Schleider Jessica L, Weisz John R
Psychology Department, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016 Aug;47(4):603-17. doi: 10.1007/s10578-015-0595-2.
Research shows relations between entity theories-i.e., beliefs that traits and abilities are unchangeable-and youth psychopathology. A common interpretation has been that entity theories lead to psychopathology, but another possibility is that psychopathology predicts entity theories. The two models carry different implications for developmental psychopathology and intervention design. We tested each model's plausibility, examining longitudinal associations between entity theories of thoughts, feelings, and behavior and psychopathology in early adolescents across one school year (N = 59, 52 % female, ages 11-14, 0 % attrition). Baseline entity theories did not predict increases in psychopathology; instead, baseline psychopathology predicted increased entity theories over time. When symptom clusters were assessed individually, greater youth internalizing (but not externalizing) problems predicted subsequent increases in entity theories. Findings suggest that the commonly proposed predictive model may not be the only one warranting attention. They suggest that youth psychopathology may contribute to the development of certain kinds of entity theories.
研究表明实体理论(即认为特质和能力是不可改变的信念)与青少年心理病理学之间存在关联。一种常见的解释是实体理论会导致心理病理学,但另一种可能性是心理病理学预示着实体理论。这两种模型对发展性心理病理学和干预设计有着不同的影响。我们检验了每种模型的合理性,考察了一学年中青少年早期(N = 59,52%为女性,年龄11 - 14岁,无损耗)思想、情感和行为的实体理论与心理病理学之间的纵向关联。基线实体理论并不能预测心理病理学的增加;相反,基线心理病理学预示着随着时间推移实体理论会增加。当单独评估症状群时,青少年更多的内化(而非外化)问题预示着随后实体理论的增加。研究结果表明,通常提出的预测模型可能不是唯一值得关注的模型。它们表明青少年心理病理学可能有助于某些类型实体理论的发展。