Jacob Andrew, Scott Melissa, Falkmer Marita, Falkmer Torbjörn
School of Occupational Therapy & Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Occupational Therapy & Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC).Long Pocket, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0139896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139896. eCollection 2015.
Despite an ambition from adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to be employed, there are limited opportunities for competitive employment for this group. Employment is not only an entitlement enjoyed by others in society, but employing adults with ASD also has economic benefits by decreasing lost productivity and resource costs for this group. Few studies have explored the cost-benefit ratio for employing adults with ASD and even fewer have taken the viewpoint of the employer, particularly applying this situation to ASD. Until such study occurs, employers may continue to be reluctant to employ adults from this group.
This review aimed to examine the costs, benefits and the cost-benefit ratio of employing adults with ASD, from a societal perspective and from the perspective of employers.
Eight databases were searched for scientific studies within defined inclusion criteria. These databases included CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Emerald, Ovid Medline, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science.
Enhancing the opportunities for adults with ASD to join the workforce is beneficial from a societal perspective, not only from an inclusiveness viewpoint, but also from a strict economic standpoint. Providing supported employment services for adults with ASD does not only cut the cost compared with providing standard care, it also results in better outcomes for adults with ASD. Despite the fact that ASD was the most expensive group to provide vocational rehabilitation services for, adults with ASD have a strong chance of becoming employed once appropriate measures are in place. Hence, rehabilitation services could be considered as a worthwhile investment. The current systematic review uncovered the fact that very few studies have examined the benefits, the costs and the cost-benefit ratio of employing an adult with ASD from the perspective of employers indicating a need for this topic to be further explored.
尽管患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的成年人有就业的意愿,但该群体获得竞争性就业的机会有限。就业不仅是社会中其他人所享有的权利,而且雇佣患有ASD的成年人还具有经济效益,因为这可以减少该群体的生产力损失和资源成本。很少有研究探讨雇佣患有ASD的成年人的成本效益比,从雇主角度进行研究的更少,尤其是将这种情况应用于ASD。在进行此类研究之前,雇主可能会继续不愿意雇佣这个群体的成年人。
本综述旨在从社会角度和雇主角度研究雇佣患有ASD的成年人的成本、效益和成本效益比。
在八个数据库中搜索符合既定纳入标准的科学研究。这些数据库包括护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL Plus)、考克兰图书馆、Emerald、Ovid医学数据库(Ovid Medline)、ProQuest、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、Scopus和科学引文索引(Web of Science)。
从社会角度来看,增加患有ASD的成年人的就业机会是有益的,不仅从包容性角度来看如此,从严格的经济角度来看也是如此。为患有ASD的成年人提供支持性就业服务不仅与提供标准护理相比成本更低,而且对患有ASD的成年人也会产生更好的结果。尽管ASD是提供职业康复服务成本最高的群体,但一旦采取适当措施,患有ASD的成年人有很大的就业机会。因此,康复服务可被视为一项值得的投资。当前的系统综述发现,很少有研究从雇主角度研究雇佣患有ASD的成年人的效益、成本和成本效益比,这表明该主题需要进一步探索。