• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人房颤患者直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的虚弱和临床结局:一项队列研究。

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation : A Cohort Study.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Hebrew SeniorLife, and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (D.H.K.).

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (A.P., J.J.G., L.G.B., H.L., R.J.G., S.S.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1214-1223. doi: 10.7326/M20-7141. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

DOI:10.7326/M20-7141
PMID:34280330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8453126/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of differing levels of frailty in the choice of oral anticoagulants for older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin by frailty levels.

DESIGN

1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of Medicare data, 2010 to 2017.

SETTING

Community.

PATIENTS

Medicare beneficiaries with AF who initiated use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin.

MEASUREMENTS

Composite end point of death, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding by frailty levels, defined by a claims-based frailty index.

RESULTS

In the dabigatran-warfarin cohort ( = 158 730; median follow-up, 72 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 63.5 for dabigatran initiators and 65.6 for warfarin initiators (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.05]; rate difference [RD], -2.2 [CI, -6.5 to 2.1]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.81 (CI, 0.68 to 0.97), 0.98 (CI, 0.90 to 1.08), and 1.09 (CI, 0.96 to 1.23), respectively. In the rivaroxaban-warfarin cohort ( = 275 944; median follow-up, 82 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 77.8 for rivaroxaban initiators and 83.7 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.94 to 1.02]; RD, -5.9 [CI, -9.4 to -2.4]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.88 (CI, 0.77 to 0.99), 1.04 (CI, 0.98 to 1.10), and 0.96 (CI, 0.89 to 1.04), respectively. In the apixaban-warfarin cohort ( = 218 738; median follow-up, 84 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 60.1 for apixaban initiators and 92.3 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.65 to 0.72]; RD, -32.2 [CI, -36.1 to -28.3]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.61 (CI, 0.52 to 0.71), 0.66 (CI, 0.61 to 0.70), and 0.73 (CI, 0.67 to 0.80), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounding and lack of clinical frailty assessment.

CONCLUSION

For older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with lower rates of adverse events across all frailty levels. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower event rates only among nonfrail patients.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institute on Aging.

摘要

背景

在患有心房颤动(AF)的老年人中,不同程度的虚弱对口服抗凝剂的选择的作用尚不清楚。

目的

通过虚弱程度检查比较直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与华法林的治疗结果。

设计

2010 年至 2017 年期间,对 Medicare 数据进行了 1:1 的倾向评分匹配分析。

设置

社区。

患者

使用达比加群、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班或华法林的 Medicare 受益人群患有 AF。

测量

通过基于索赔的虚弱指数定义的虚弱程度,计算死亡、缺血性中风或主要出血的复合终点。

结果

在达比加群-华法林队列(n=158730;中位随访时间 72 天)中,达比加群和华法林的起始者的每 1000 人年的事件发生率分别为 63.5 和 65.6(风险比[HR],0.98[95%CI,0.92 至 1.05];率差[RD],-2.2[CI,-6.5 至 2.1])。对于非虚弱、虚弱前期和虚弱的患者,HR 分别为 0.81(CI,0.68 至 0.97)、0.98(CI,0.90 至 1.08)和 1.09(CI,0.96 至 1.23)。在利伐沙班-华法林队列(n=275944;中位随访时间 82 天)中,利伐沙班和华法林的起始者的每 1000 人年的事件发生率分别为 77.8 和 83.7(HR,0.98[CI,0.94 至 1.02];RD,-5.9[CI,-9.4 至-2.4])。对于非虚弱、虚弱前期和虚弱的患者,HR 分别为 0.88(CI,0.77 至 0.99)、1.04(CI,0.98 至 1.10)和 0.96(CI,0.89 至 1.04)。在阿哌沙班-华法林队列(n=218738;中位随访时间 84 天)中,阿哌沙班和华法林的起始者的每 1000 人年的事件发生率分别为 60.1 和 92.3(HR,0.68[CI,0.65 至 0.72];RD,-32.2[CI,-36.1 至-28.3])。对于非虚弱、虚弱前期和虚弱的患者,HR 分别为 0.61(CI,0.52 至 0.71)、0.66(CI,0.61 至 0.70)和 0.73(CI,0.67 至 0.80)。

局限性

残留混杂因素和缺乏临床虚弱评估。

结论

对于患有 AF 的老年人,阿哌沙班在所有虚弱水平的不良事件发生率均较低。达比加群和利伐沙班仅在非虚弱患者中与较低的事件发生率相关。

主要资金来源

美国国家老龄化研究所。

相似文献

1
Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation : A Cohort Study.老年人房颤患者直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的虚弱和临床结局:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1214-1223. doi: 10.7326/M20-7141. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
Prospective Monitoring of New Drugs in Older Adults with and without Frailty: Near-Real-Time Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Data.老年人衰弱和非衰弱患者中新药的前瞻性监测:医疗保险数据中口服抗凝剂有效性和安全性的近实时评估。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Sep;41(9):763-773. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01142-9. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的口服抗凝剂比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1662-1671. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15956. Epub 2019 May 21.
6
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure.口服抗凝剂在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者中的有效性和安全性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0213614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213614. eCollection 2019.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.
8
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林在新诊断房颤中的有效性和安全性比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 15;120(10):1813-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.092. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
Effectiveness and safety of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study.低剂量非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林在房颤患者中的有效性和安全性:倾向评分加权的全国队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Feb 10;356:j510. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j510.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Patients With Cirrhosis and Atrial Fibrillation : A Nationwide Cohort Study.比较肝硬化合并心房颤动患者中阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和华法林的有效性和安全性:一项全国性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug;177(8):1028-1038. doi: 10.7326/M23-3067. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal patterns of antidepressant and benzodiazepine use associated with injurious falls in older adults with depression: a retrospective cohort study.抑郁症老年患者中与伤害性跌倒相关的抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物的纵向使用模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Aug 20;23(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04325-2.
2
Comorbidity and medication patterns in atrial fibrillation patients: association with adverse clinical outcomes.心房颤动患者的合并症与用药模式:与不良临床结局的关联
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-04047-6.
3
Disparities in the care and direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) management in atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in English primary care between 2018 and 2022: primary care sentinel network database study.

本文引用的文献

1
Emulating Randomized Clinical Trials With Nonrandomized Real-World Evidence Studies: First Results From the RCT DUPLICATE Initiative.基于真实世界证据的非随机研究模拟随机对照试验:RCT DUPLICATE 计划的初步结果。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):1002-1013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051718. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Updating International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision to 10th Revision of a Claims-Based Frailty Index.将基于索赔的衰弱指数从国际疾病分类第9版更新至第10版。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Jun 14;76(7):1316-1317. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa150.
3
Changes in Predictive Performance of a Frailty Index with Availability of Clinical Domains.
2018年至2022年英国初级医疗中房颤(AF)和慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者护理及直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)管理的差异:初级医疗哨点网络数据库研究
Open Heart. 2025 May 21;12(1):e002923. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002923.
4
Stroke Prevention With Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation in an Aging Population.老年高危心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂预防卒中
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 1):101757. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101757. Epub 2025 May 9.
5
Efficacy, safety, and bleeding risk factor analysis of oral anticoagulants in AF patients ≥ 65 years of age: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.≥65岁房颤患者口服抗凝剂的疗效、安全性及出血危险因素分析:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05838-4.
6
Safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy in older people with atrial fibrillation during exposed and unexposed treatment periods.抗凝治疗在暴露和未暴露治疗期间对老年房颤患者的安全性和有效性。
Heart. 2025 May 23;111(12):565-574. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324763.
7
Health Care Spending After Initiating Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers for Heart Failure Treatment.与肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂相比,起始沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭后的医疗保健支出。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Feb 7;6(2):e245385. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5385.
8
Prescribing Trends of Glucose-Lowering Medications Near End of Life Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study.2型糖尿病成人患者临终前降糖药物的处方趋势:一项队列研究
Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):455-463. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1795.
9
Poor clinical outcomes associated to multimorbidity, frailty and malnutrition in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者中与多种疾病、虚弱和营养不良相关的不良临床结局。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jan;29(1):100430. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100430. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
10
Assessing Frailty-Specific Treatment Effect in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.评估心血管疾病中特定衰弱治疗效果:一项系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2024 Dec;41(12):945-958. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01157-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
临床领域的可用性对衰弱指数预测性能的影响变化。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1771-1777. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16436. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Predicting Mortality and Adverse Outcomes: Comparing the Frailty Index to General Prognostic Indices.预测死亡率和不良结局:将衰弱指数与一般预后指标进行比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1516-1522. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05700-w. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
5
Measuring Frailty in Administrative Claims Data: Comparative Performance of Four Claims-Based Frailty Measures in the U.S. Medicare Data.在行政索赔数据中测量虚弱程度:美国医疗保险数据中四种基于索赔的虚弱程度衡量标准的比较性能。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 May 22;75(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz224.
6
Moving Frailty Toward Clinical Practice: NIA Intramural Frailty Science Symposium Summary.推动脆弱性进入临床实践:NIA 院内脆弱性科学研讨会总结。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1559-1564. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15928. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232.
9
Management of atrial fibrillation for older people with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人衰弱相关心房颤动的管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2019 Mar 1;48(2):196-203. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy180.
10
Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index Against Physical Performance and Adverse Health Outcomes in the Health and Retirement Study.基于索赔的衰弱指数对健康与退休研究中身体表现和不良健康结果的验证。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1271-1276. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly197.