van Oss Ruth, Abbo Shahal, Eshed Ravit, Sherman Amir, Coyne Clarice J, Vandemark George J, Zhang Hong-Bin, Peleg Zvi
The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Genomic unit Plant Sciences Institute, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO)-Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 8;10(10):e0139789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139789. eCollection 2015.
There is a debate concerning mono- or poly-phyletic origins of the Near Eastern crops. In parallel, some authors claim that domestication was not possible within the natural range of the wild progenitors due to wild alleles flow into the nascent crops. Here we address both, the mono- or poly-phyletic origins and the domestications within or without the natural range of the progenitor, debates in order to understand the relationship between domesticated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild progenitor (C. reticulatum Ladizinsky) with special emphasis on its domestication centre in southeastern Turkey. A set of 103 chickpea cultivars and landraces from the major growing regions alongside wild accessions (C. reticulatum, C. echinospermum P.H Davis and C. bijugum K.H. Rech) sampled across the natural distribution range in eastern Turkey were genotyped with 194 SNPs markers. The genetic affinities between and within the studied taxa were assessed. The analysis suggests a mono-phyletic origin of the cultigen, with several wild accession as likely members of the wild stock of the cultigen. Clear separation between the wild and domesticated germplasm was apparent, with negligible level of admixture. A single C. reticulatum accession shows morphological and allelic signatures of admixture, a likely result of introgression. No evidence of geneflow from the wild into domesticated germplasm was found. The traditional farming systems of southeaster Turkey are characterized by occurrence of sympatric wild progenitor-domesticated forms of chickpea (and likewise cereals and other grain legumes). Therefore, both the authentic crop landraces and the wild populations native to the area are a unique genetic resource. Our results grant support to the notion of domestication within the natural distribution range of the wild progenitor, suggesting that the Neolithic domesticators were fully capable of selecting the desired phenotypes even when facing rare wild-domesticated introgression events.
关于近东作物的单系或多系起源存在争论。与此同时,一些作者声称,由于野生等位基因流入新生作物,在野生祖先的自然分布范围内不可能发生驯化。在这里,我们讨论了单系或多系起源以及在祖先自然分布范围内或之外的驯化问题,以了解驯化鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)与其野生祖先(C. reticulatum Ladizinsky)之间的关系,特别强调其在土耳其东南部的驯化中心。对来自主要种植区的103个鹰嘴豆品种和地方品种以及在土耳其东部自然分布范围内采集的野生种质(C. reticulatum、C. echinospermum P.H Davis和C. bijugum K.H. Rech)进行了基因分型,使用了194个SNP标记。评估了研究类群之间和内部的遗传亲缘关系。分析表明栽培品种起源于单系,有几个野生种质可能是栽培品种野生种群的成员。野生和驯化种质之间有明显的分离,混杂水平可忽略不计。一个C. reticulatum种质表现出混杂的形态和等位基因特征,这可能是基因渗入的结果。未发现从野生种质到驯化种质的基因流动证据。土耳其东南部的传统农业系统的特点是鹰嘴豆(以及谷物和其他豆类)存在同域的野生祖先-驯化形式。因此,该地区的正宗作物地方品种和野生种群都是独特的遗传资源。我们的结果支持了在野生祖先自然分布范围内进行驯化的观点,这表明新石器时代的驯化者即使面临罕见的野生-驯化基因渗入事件,也完全有能力选择所需的表型。