Siler Thomas M, Kerwin Edward, Singletary Karen, Brooks Jean, Church Alison
a Midwest Chest Consultants, PC, St. Charles , Missouri , USA.
b Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon , Medford , Oregon , USA.
COPD. 2016;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg) or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV1 over 0-6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 (Day 85: 0.127-0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0-6 hours post-dose WM FEV1 versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144-0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1-12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37-41% in Study 1 and 36-38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD.
作用机制不同且互补的药物联合使用,可能会提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗效果。在两项为期12周的双盲平行组研究中,COPD患者按1:1:1随机分组,每日一次使用乌美溴铵(UMEC;62.5μg和125μg)或安慰剂(PBO),并加用每日两次的丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FP/SAL;250/50μg)。在两项研究中,主要疗效指标均为第85天的谷值1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。次要终点为给药后0至6小时(第84天)的加权平均(WM)FEV1和沙丁胺醇急救药物的使用情况。还对健康相关生活质量结局(圣乔治呼吸问卷[SGRQ]和慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试[CAT])进行了检查。全程评估安全性。与PBO+FP/SAL相比,两种UMEC+FP/SAL剂量组的谷值FEV1(第85天:0.127 - 0.148L)均有统计学意义的改善。同样,与PBO+FP/SAL相比,两种UMEC+FP/SAL剂量组在给药后0至6小时的WM FEV1也有统计学意义的改善(第84天:0.144 - 0.165L)。在两项研究中,与PBO+FP/SAL相比,UMEC+FP/SAL组在第1至12周的急救药物使用量均减少(研究1,两种剂量均为0.3吸/天;研究2,UMEC 125+FP/SAL为0.5吸/天)。与PBO+FP/SAL相比,两种剂量的UMEC+FP/SAL组的CAT评分自基线的下降幅度通常更大(研究2第84天除外)。在研究1中,UMEC+FP/SAL与PBO+FP/SAL之间未观察到SGRQ评分差异;然而,在研究2中,与PBO+FP/SAL相比,UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL(第28天)和UMEC 125+FP/SAL(第28天和第84天)有统计学意义的改善。研究1中所有治疗组的治疗期不良事件发生率为37 - 41%,研究2中为36 - 38%。总体而言,这些数据表明,对于COPD患者,UMEC+FP/SAL联合用药比单独使用FP/SAL可提供更多益处。