Suppr超能文献

在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,将umeclidinium添加到丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗中的疗效和安全性:两项随机、双盲研究的结果

Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies.

作者信息

Siler Thomas M, Kerwin Edward, Singletary Karen, Brooks Jean, Church Alison

机构信息

a Midwest Chest Consultants, PC, St. Charles , Missouri , USA.

b Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon , Medford , Oregon , USA.

出版信息

COPD. 2016;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

Abstract

Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg) or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV1 over 0-6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 (Day 85: 0.127-0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0-6 hours post-dose WM FEV1 versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144-0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1-12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37-41% in Study 1 and 36-38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD.

摘要

作用机制不同且互补的药物联合使用,可能会提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗效果。在两项为期12周的双盲平行组研究中,COPD患者按1:1:1随机分组,每日一次使用乌美溴铵(UMEC;62.5μg和125μg)或安慰剂(PBO),并加用每日两次的丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FP/SAL;250/50μg)。在两项研究中,主要疗效指标均为第85天的谷值1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。次要终点为给药后0至6小时(第84天)的加权平均(WM)FEV1和沙丁胺醇急救药物的使用情况。还对健康相关生活质量结局(圣乔治呼吸问卷[SGRQ]和慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试[CAT])进行了检查。全程评估安全性。与PBO+FP/SAL相比,两种UMEC+FP/SAL剂量组的谷值FEV1(第85天:0.127 - 0.148L)均有统计学意义的改善。同样,与PBO+FP/SAL相比,两种UMEC+FP/SAL剂量组在给药后0至6小时的WM FEV1也有统计学意义的改善(第84天:0.144 - 0.165L)。在两项研究中,与PBO+FP/SAL相比,UMEC+FP/SAL组在第1至12周的急救药物使用量均减少(研究1,两种剂量均为0.3吸/天;研究2,UMEC 125+FP/SAL为0.5吸/天)。与PBO+FP/SAL相比,两种剂量的UMEC+FP/SAL组的CAT评分自基线的下降幅度通常更大(研究2第84天除外)。在研究1中,UMEC+FP/SAL与PBO+FP/SAL之间未观察到SGRQ评分差异;然而,在研究2中,与PBO+FP/SAL相比,UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL(第28天)和UMEC 125+FP/SAL(第28天和第84天)有统计学意义的改善。研究1中所有治疗组的治疗期不良事件发生率为37 - 41%,研究2中为36 - 38%。总体而言,这些数据表明,对于COPD患者,UMEC+FP/SAL联合用药比单独使用FP/SAL可提供更多益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/411b/4778542/d8ac0d8124ee/icop_a_1034256_f0001_b.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验