• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗偏好:来自英国、美国和德国的定性访谈及焦点小组结果

Treatment Preferences of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from Qualitative Interviews and Focus Groups in the United Kingdom, United States, and Germany.

作者信息

Schroeder Melanie, Hall Katie, Eliasson Lina, Bracey Sophia, Gunsoy Necdet B, Macey Jake, Jones Paul W, Ismaila Afisi S

机构信息

Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Brentford, United Kingdom.

Patient Centred Outcomes, ICON plc., London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2021 Jan;8(1):19-30. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.8.1.2020.0131.

DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.8.1.2020.0131
PMID:33150778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8047617/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A wide range of therapeutic regimens, including single-inhaler triple therapies (SITTs), are now available for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, an improved understanding of patient preferences may be valuable to inform physician prescribing decisions. This study was performed to assess the factors considered by patients when making decisions about their COPD treatments using qualitative techniques.

METHODS

In the United Kingdom, United States and Germany, individual qualitative interviews (n=10 per country) and focus groups (1 per country; [United Kingdom, n=4; United States, n=6; Germany, n=6 participants]) were conducted. Interviews and focus groups were semi‑structured, lasting approximately 60 minutes, and focused on treatment preferences. Data were analyzed according to emerging themes identified from the interviews; qualitative thematic analysis of the data was performed using specialist software.

RESULTS

In interviews and focus groups, efficacy, ease of use, and lower frequency of use were favored attributes for current treatment, while side effects, medication taste, and more complex administration techniques were key dislikes. In interviews, most participants would consider a switch in medication, mainly for improved efficacy, but also to reduce medication frequency or following physician advice. Overall, efficacy and ease of use were the 2 most important attributes reported in interviews in all 3 countries.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COPD have preferences for certain attributes of medication, highlighting the multi-faceted nature of treatment effectiveness and the importance of the delivery device.These results were subsequently used to inform the design of a discrete choice experiment.

摘要

背景

目前有多种治疗方案,包括单吸入器三联疗法(SITT),可用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的维持治疗。因此,更好地了解患者偏好可能有助于指导医生的处方决策。本研究旨在使用定性技术评估患者在做出COPD治疗决策时考虑的因素。

方法

在英国、美国和德国开展了个人定性访谈(每个国家10例)和焦点小组访谈(每个国家1组;[英国,4名参与者;美国,6名参与者;德国,6名参与者])。访谈和焦点小组访谈采用半结构化形式,持续约60分钟,重点关注治疗偏好。根据访谈中确定的新出现的主题对数据进行分析;使用专业软件对数据进行定性主题分析。

结果

在访谈和焦点小组访谈中,疗效、易用性和较低的使用频率是当前治疗中受青睐的属性,而副作用、药物味道和更复杂的给药技术是主要的厌恶因素。在访谈中,大多数参与者会考虑更换药物,主要是为了提高疗效,也为了减少用药频率或听从医生的建议。总体而言,疗效和易用性是所有3个国家访谈中报告的2个最重要的属性。

结论

COPD患者对药物的某些属性有偏好,突出了治疗效果的多面性和给药装置的重要性。这些结果随后被用于指导离散选择实验的设计。

相似文献

1
Treatment Preferences of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from Qualitative Interviews and Focus Groups in the United Kingdom, United States, and Germany.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗偏好:来自英国、美国和德国的定性访谈及焦点小组结果
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2021 Jan;8(1):19-30. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.8.1.2020.0131.
2
Evaluating Patient Preferences of Maintenance Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment in the UK, USA and Germany.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗的患者偏好:英国、美国和德国的离散选择实验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Mar 18;15:595-604. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S221980. eCollection 2020.
3
Patient preferences for dry powder inhaler attributes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in France: a discrete choice experiment.法国哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对干粉吸入器属性的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0439-x.
4
Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain: results from a discrete choice experiment.美国、英国、意大利、德国、法国和西班牙复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗偏好:离散选择实验的结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 23;10:1271657. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1271657. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation and quantification of treatment preferences for patients with asthma or COPD using discrete choice experiment surveys.采用离散选择实验调查评估和量化哮喘或 COPD 患者的治疗偏好。
Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的治疗偏好:一项离散选择实验
Clin Ther. 2017 Apr;39(4):723-737. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Evaluation of patient preference and willingness to pay for attributes of maintenance medication for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).评价慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)维持药物治疗属性的患者偏好和支付意愿。
Patient. 2014;7(4):413-26. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0064-1.
8
Maintenance inhaler preference, attribute importance, and satisfaction in prescribing physicians and patients with asthma, COPD, or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome consulting for routine care.维持性吸入器偏好、属性重要性以及哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘-COPD重叠综合征患者及开具处方的医生在接受常规护理咨询时的满意度。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Mar 16;13:927-936. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154525. eCollection 2018.
9
Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.慢性疼痛患者的治疗偏好:离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;16(6):613-28. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0614-4. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
10
Patient preference for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment inhalers: a discrete choice experiment in France.患者对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗吸入器的偏好:法国的一项离散选择实验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):785-792. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1574507. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the Global distribution, risk factors, and temporal trends of COPD incidence and mortality (1990-2021): ecological analysis.绘制慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病率和死亡率的全球分布、风险因素及时间趋势(1990 - 2021年):生态分析
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04014-0.
2
Preferences of patients with multiple chronic diseases for medication in rural areas of an Eastern Province China: a discrete choice experiment.中国东部某省农村地区慢性病患者的用药偏好:一项离散选择实验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 9;11:1439136. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1439136. eCollection 2024.
3
The Training to Improve Dyspnoea Study- Patient Experiences of Using a High Frequency Airway Oscillating Device.改善呼吸困难的训练研究——使用高频气道振荡装置的患者体验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jun 13;19:1345-1355. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S443186. eCollection 2024.
4
Individual trajectory-based care for COPD: getting closer, but not there yet.慢性阻塞性肺疾病基于个体轨迹的照护:正在接近目标,但尚未达成。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Dec 13;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00451-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Patient Preferences of Maintenance Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment in the UK, USA and Germany.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗的患者偏好:英国、美国和德国的离散选择实验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Mar 18;15:595-604. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S221980. eCollection 2020.
2
Global prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Mar 19;25(1):47-57. doi: 10.26719/emhj.18.014.
3
Patient preference for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment inhalers: a discrete choice experiment in France.患者对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗吸入器的偏好:法国的一项离散选择实验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):785-792. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1574507. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)单一吸入器三联疗法的当前评估
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Sep 28;13:3003-3009. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S177333. eCollection 2018.
5
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD.COPD 患者每日一次单吸入器三联与双联治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1671-1680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Extrafine inhaled triple therapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRIBUTE): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.特布他林、布地奈德/福莫特罗和茚达特罗/格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRIBUTE)的随机对照双盲平行分组研究
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30206-X. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
Evaluation and quantification of treatment preferences for patients with asthma or COPD using discrete choice experiment surveys.采用离散选择实验调查评估和量化哮喘或 COPD 患者的治疗偏好。
Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Patient preferences for dry powder inhaler attributes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in France: a discrete choice experiment.法国哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对干粉吸入器属性的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0439-x.
9
Life Impact and Treatment Preferences of Individuals with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results from Qualitative Interviews and Focus Groups.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的生活影响及治疗偏好:定性访谈和焦点小组的结果
Adv Ther. 2017 Jun;34(6):1466-1481. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0557-0. Epub 2017 May 23.
10
Single inhaler extrafine triple therapy versus long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRINITY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.三联单吸入器超细干粉治疗与长效抗胆碱能药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRINITY):一项双盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1919-1929. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30188-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.