Aulicky R, Stejskal V, Frydova B, Athanassiou C G
Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507, 161 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, Phytokou str. 38446, N. Ionia, Magnesia, Greece.
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Dec;108(6):2823-30. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov257. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
In this study, we evaluated phosphine efficacy against two strains of the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), one laboratory strain, with no previous exposure to phosphine, and one field strain, originated from the flour mill on which we performed the fumigation. The standard Detia Degesh Phosphine Resistance Kit showed that the adults of the field strain of T. confusum required 4.4 × longer time to be knocked down than the laboratory strain. In order to assess the efficacy of phosphine in the field against these strains, aluminium phosphide (AlP) was applied in a flour mill in Czech Republic, in 2014. In this application, temperature among the six floors of the flour mill varied between 20 and 30°C, relative humidity (RH) between 44 and 78%, and phosphine concentration-time-products (CtP) between 24 and 38 g.m(-3).h(-1). Moreover, the insects were bioassayed in dishes that contained either no commodity or 1, 3, and 5 cm of flour. Nevertheless, despite these variations, all adults and larvae from both strains were dead, regardless of the floor, the quantity of the commodity, and the conditions prevailing. However, larval emergence from eggs that were used in the bioassays for both strains was recorded in some of the locations tested. In addition, larval emergence was negatively correlated with both temperature and RH. At the same time, emergence was generally similar between strains. The results of the present study illustrate that highly visible dead adults and larvae after the application of phosphine falsely imply good fumigation efficacy, given that a considerable number of eggs are very likely to survive in a wider range of conditions, and the concomitant larval emergence may result in rapid population grown right after the fumigation.
在本研究中,我们评估了磷化氢对两种赤拟谷盗(Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val,鞘翅目:拟步甲科)品系的防治效果,一种是实验室品系,之前未接触过磷化氢,另一种是田间品系,源自我们进行熏蒸处理的面粉厂。标准的Detia Degesh磷化氢抗性检测试剂盒显示,赤拟谷盗田间品系的成虫被击倒所需时间比实验室品系长4.4倍。为了评估磷化氢在田间对这些品系的防治效果,2014年在捷克共和国的一家面粉厂施用了磷化铝(AlP)。在此次施药过程中,面粉厂六层之间的温度在20至30°C之间变化,相对湿度(RH)在44至78%之间,磷化氢浓度-时间乘积(CtP)在24至38 g·m⁻³·h⁻¹之间。此外,昆虫在不含商品或含有1厘米、3厘米和5厘米面粉的培养皿中进行生物测定。然而,尽管存在这些差异,两个品系的所有成虫和幼虫均死亡,无论楼层、商品数量以及当时的环境条件如何。不过,在一些测试地点记录到了用于两个品系生物测定的卵孵化出幼虫的情况。此外,幼虫孵化与温度和相对湿度均呈负相关。同时,两个品系之间的孵化情况总体相似。本研究结果表明,施用磷化氢后大量可见的死成虫和幼虫会错误地暗示熏蒸效果良好,因为相当数量的卵很可能在更广泛的条件下存活,随之而来的幼虫孵化可能导致熏蒸后种群迅速增长。