Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
UMR-S 1158, INSERM et Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):82-92. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4087-4. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Over the last two decades, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been proposed in various causes of acute respiratory failure (ARF) but some indications are debated. Current trends in NIV use are unknown.
Comparison of three multicenter prospective audits including all patients receiving mechanical ventilation and conducted in 1997, 2002, and 2011 in francophone countries.
Among the 4132 patients enrolled, 2094 (51%) required ventilatory support for ARF and 2038 (49 %) for non-respiratory conditions. Overall NIV use was markedly increased in 2010/11 compared to 1997 and 2002 (37% of mechanically ventilated patients vs. 16% and 28%, P < 0.05). In 2010/11, the use of first-line NIV for ARF had reached a plateau (24% vs. 16% and 23%, P < 0.05) whereas pre-ICU and post-extubation NIV had substantially increased (11% vs. 4% and 11% vs. 7%, respectively, P < 0.05). First-line NIV remained stable in acute-on-chronic RF, continued to increase in cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but decreased in de novo ARF (16% in 2010/11 vs. 23% in 2002, P < 0.05). The NIV success rate increased from 56% in 2002 to 70% in 2010/11 and remained the lowest in de novo ARF. NIV failure in de novo ARF was associated with increased mortality in 2002 but not in 2010/11. Mortality decreased over time, and overall, NIV use was associated with a lower mortality.
Increases in NIV use and success rate, an overall decrease in mortality, and a decrease of the adverse impact NIV failure has in de novo ARF suggest better patient selection and greater proficiency of staff in administering NIV.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01449331.
在过去的二十年中,无创通气(NIV)已被提出用于各种急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)的病因,但一些适应证仍存在争议。目前关于 NIV 使用的趋势尚不清楚。
对三个多中心前瞻性研究进行比较,这些研究于 1997 年、2002 年和 2011 年在法语国家进行,纳入了所有接受机械通气的患者。
在纳入的 4132 例患者中,2094 例(51%)因 ARF 需要通气支持,2038 例(49%)因非呼吸原因需要通气支持。与 1997 年和 2002 年相比,2010/11 年 NIV 的使用率明显增加(37%的机械通气患者 vs. 16%和 28%,P<0.05)。2010/11 年,ARF 一线 NIV 的使用率已达到平台期(24% vs. 16%和 23%,P<0.05),而 ICU 前和拔管后 NIV 则大幅增加(11% vs. 4%和 11% vs. 7%,分别,P<0.05)。在慢性加重的急性 RF 中,一线 NIV 保持稳定,在心源性肺水肿中继续增加,但在新发 ARF 中减少(2010/11 年为 16%,2002 年为 23%,P<0.05)。2002 年 NIV 的成功率为 56%,2010/11 年增至 70%,新发 ARF 的成功率仍最低。新发 ARF 中 NIV 失败与 2002 年死亡率增加相关,但 2010/11 年不相关。死亡率随时间下降,总体而言,NIV 的使用与死亡率降低相关。
NIV 使用和成功率的增加、总体死亡率的降低,以及 NIV 失败对新发 ARF 不良影响的降低,表明患者选择更好,医护人员进行 NIV 的能力更强。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT01449331。