• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大孔径对三种多焦点镜片光学质量的影响。

Effect of Large Apertures on the Optical Quality of Three Multifocal Lenses.

作者信息

Esteve-Taboada Jose Juan, Domínguez-Vicent Alberto, Del Águila-Carrasco Antonio J, Ferrer-Blasco Teresa, Montés-Micó Robert

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;31(10):666-76. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150928-01.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20150928-01
PMID:26469074
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the optical quality under large apertures among three multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): the TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), the AT LISA tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and the Finevision (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium).

METHODS

The in vitro optical quality of each lens was assessed with an instrument that measured the modulation transfer function (MTF). The optical quality of each lens was described in terms of MTF and through focus average MTF. The Strehl ratio, cut-off frequency, area of visibility, and percentage energy were calculated to objectively describe the optical quality of each lens. These metrics were assessed for the best lens distance focus and at four vergences (from -1.50 to -3.00 D in 0.50-D steps) at a 4.5-mm aperture.

RESULTS

The through focus average MTF of the AT LISA and Finevision IOLs showed three mean areas corresponding to distance, intermediate, and near vision. The TECNIS Symfony IOL showed two main areas corresponding to distance and intermediate vision. All metrics revealed that the Finevision IOL showed the best optical quality at distance vision, the TECNIS Symfony IOL at intermediate vision, and the AT LISA IOL at near vision. The TECNIS Symfony IOL showed the most homogeneous light distribution between its best vision foci.

CONCLUSIONS

The TECNIS Symfony IOL is less vergence dependent than the AT LISA and Finevision IOLs under dim conditions. These results may help clinicians to choose the proper lens depending on the patient's visual requirements.

摘要

目的

比较三种多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)在大孔径下的光学质量,这三种人工晶状体分别是:TECNIS Symfony ZXR00(雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州雅培公园)、AT LISA tri 839MP(卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司,德国耶拿)和Finevision(比利时列日市PhysIOL公司)。

方法

使用测量调制传递函数(MTF)的仪器评估每个晶状体的体外光学质量。每个晶状体的光学质量通过MTF和全焦距平均MTF来描述。计算斯特列尔比、截止频率、可见度面积和能量百分比,以客观描述每个晶状体的光学质量。在4.5毫米孔径下,针对最佳晶状体距离焦点以及四个不同的屈光度(从-1.50到-3.00 D,步长为0.50 D)评估这些指标。

结果

AT LISA和Finevision人工晶状体的全焦距平均MTF显示出对应远、中、近视力的三个平均区域。TECNIS Symfony人工晶状体显示出对应远视力和中视力的两个主要区域。所有指标均显示,Finevision人工晶状体在远视力下光学质量最佳,TECNIS Symfony人工晶状体在中视力下最佳,AT LISA人工晶状体在近视力下最佳。TECNIS Symfony人工晶状体在其最佳视力焦点之间显示出最均匀的光分布。

结论

在暗光条件下,TECNIS Symfony人工晶状体比AT LISA和Finevision人工晶状体对屈光度的依赖性更小。这些结果可能有助于临床医生根据患者的视觉需求选择合适的晶状体。

相似文献

1
Effect of Large Apertures on the Optical Quality of Three Multifocal Lenses.大孔径对三种多焦点镜片光学质量的影响。
J Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;31(10):666-76. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150928-01.
2
In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony.Mini WELL Ready渐进多焦点镜片与TECNIS Symfony镜片的体外光学质量比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;254(7):1387-97. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3240-7. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
3
In vitro optical quality comparison of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses and 1 progressive multifocal intraocular lens.2种三焦点人工晶状体与1种渐进多焦点人工晶状体的体外光学质量比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):138-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.040.
4
[Optical quality of three trifocal intraocular lens models : An optical bench comparison].[三种三焦点人工晶状体模型的光学质量:光具座比较]
Ophthalmologe. 2018 Jan;115(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0573-0.
5
Laboratory Evaluation of Halos and Through-Focus Performance of Three Different Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.三种不同多焦点人工晶状体的彗差和离焦性能的实验室评估。
J Refract Surg. 2022 Sep;38(9):552-558. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220802-02. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
In vitro optical quality measurements of three intraocular lens models having identical platform.对具有相同平台的三种人工晶状体模型进行体外光学质量测量。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0460-0.
7
Clinically Relevant Optical Properties of Bifocal, Trifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.双焦点、三焦点和扩展景深人工晶状体的临床相关光学特性
J Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;32(4):273-80. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160121-07.
8
Effect of Decentration on the Optical Quality of Two Intraocular Lenses.偏心对两种人工晶状体光学质量的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Dec;93(12):1552-1559. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001004.
9
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.AcrySof IQ PanOptix 人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体和三焦点人工晶状体的比较:临床概述。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):335-349. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000253.
10
Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal.三种多焦点人工晶状体的光学质量差异:双焦点低附加,双焦点中附加和三焦点。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;29(11):749-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131021-04.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of visual performance between bifocal and extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.双焦点和扩展景深人工晶状体的视觉性能比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0288602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288602. eCollection 2023.
2
Pitfalls of Using NIR-Based Clinical Instruments to Test Eyes Implanted with Diffractive Intraocular Lenses.使用基于近红外光的临床仪器检测植入衍射型人工晶状体的眼睛的陷阱。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;13(7):1259. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071259.
3
Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.
扩展景深、双焦点和单焦点人工晶状体植入术后视力结果质量的差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 28;10(6):1000. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061000.
4
Comparison Between an Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00) and a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens With Enhanced Intermediate Vision (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00).Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 型扩展景深人工晶状体与 Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 新型增强中间视力的单焦点人工晶状体的比较
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021 Oct 1;10(6):542-547. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000439. Print 2021 Nov-Dec.
5
Bias of near-infrared light in evaluation of patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses.多焦点人工晶状体植入患者评估中近红外光的偏倚。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;41(9):3171-3181. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01882-2. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Visual performance of four types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and a review of articles.四种类型的衍射多焦点人工晶状体的视觉性能及文献综述
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 18;14(3):356-365. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.03.04. eCollection 2021.
7
Rainbow halos occur less following implantation of extended range of vision one-piece intraocular lenses diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses.在植入扩展视程一体式人工晶状体(衍射双焦点人工晶状体)后,彩虹光晕出现的情况较少。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 18;13(6):913-919. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.06.09. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Echelette Extended Range of Vision and Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lenses.衍射双焦点人工晶状体与宽视野人工晶状体临床疗效的比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 23;2019:5815040. doi: 10.1155/2019/5815040. eCollection 2019.
9
Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population.韩国人群中扩展景深和单焦点人工晶状体在相同非球面平台植入术后对屈光误差的耐受性前瞻性对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1193-z.
10
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.AcrySof IQ PanOptix 人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体和三焦点人工晶状体的比较:临床概述。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):335-349. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000253.