Cruz-Díaz David, Martínez-Amat Antonio, Osuna-Pérez M C, De la Torre-Cruz M J, Hita-Contreras Fidel
a Department of Health Sciences , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén , Jaén , Spain .
b Departmento de Anatomía Y Embriología, Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER) , Facultad De Medicina, University of Granada , Granada , Spain , and.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(13):1300-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1090485. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
To determine the short- and long-term effectiveness of the application of Clinical Pilates in addition to physical therapy versus a physical therapy treatment alone in a population of postmenopausal women with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
A single-blind randomized controlled trial with repeated measures and a follow-up period. One hundred and one patients were randomly allocated to a Pilates + physical therapy (PPT) group or to a physical therapy (PT) only group for six weeks. Pain and disability were measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index respectively preintervention, after 6 weeks of treatment and after 1-year follow-up.
There were significant differences between groups in pain and disability after 6 weeks of treatment, with better results in the PPT group with an effect size of d = 3.14 and d = 2.33 for pain and disability. After 1-year follow-up, only PPT group showed better results compared with baseline with an effect size of d = 2.49 and d = 4.98 for pain and disability.
The results suggest that using Clinical Pilates in addition to physical therapy provides improved results on pain management and functional status for postmenopausal woman with CLBP and that its benefits still linger after one year.
Chronic Low Back Pain could benefit from the Pilates practice in postmenopausal women. Improvement in pain and disability derived from CLBP seem to be maintained over time due to Pilates practice. Pilates constitutes a safe tool to be applied in older population with CLBP due to its ability to be adapted to every performance and physical level.
确定在患有慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的绝经后女性群体中,除物理治疗外应用临床普拉提与单纯物理治疗相比的短期和长期效果。
一项采用重复测量和随访期的单盲随机对照试验。101名患者被随机分配到普拉提+物理治疗(PPT)组或仅物理治疗(PT)组,为期六周。在干预前、治疗6周后和1年随访后,分别通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数测量疼痛和功能障碍。
治疗6周后,两组在疼痛和功能障碍方面存在显著差异,PPT组效果更好,疼痛和功能障碍的效应大小分别为d = 3.14和d = 2.33。1年随访后,与基线相比,只有PPT组显示出更好的结果,疼痛和功能障碍的效应大小分别为d = 2.49和d = 4.98。
结果表明,对于患有CLBP的绝经后女性,除物理治疗外使用临床普拉提在疼痛管理和功能状态方面能提供更好的效果,且其益处一年后仍持续存在。
绝经后女性的慢性下腰痛可以从普拉提练习中受益。由于普拉提练习,CLBP导致的疼痛和功能障碍改善似乎能随时间维持。普拉提因其能够适应各种表现和身体水平,是应用于患有CLBP老年人群体的一种安全工具。