Joslyn Susan L, Grounds Margaret A
Department of Psychology, University of Washington.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Dec;21(4):407-17. doi: 10.1037/xap0000064. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
Recent research on weather-related decision-making suggests that the inclusion of numeric uncertainty estimates in weather forecasts improves decision quality over single value forecasts or specific advice. However, it is unclear if the benefit of uncertainty estimates extends to more complex decision tasks, presumably requiring greater cognitive effort, or to tasks in which the decision is clear-cut, perhaps making the additional uncertainty information unnecessary. In the present research, participants completed a task in which they used single value weather forecasts, either alone, with freeze probabilities, advice, or both, to decide whether to apply salt to roads in winter to prevent icing or to withhold salt and risk a penalty. Participants completed either a simple binary choice version of the task or a complex version with 3 response options and accompanying rules for application. Some participants were shown forecasts near the freezing point, such that the need for salt was ambiguous, whereas other participants were shown forecasts well below the freezing point. Results suggest that participants with uncertainty estimates did better overall, and neither the task complexity nor the coldness of the forecasts reduced that advantage. However, unexpectedly colder forecasts lead to poorer decisions and an advantage for specific advice.
近期有关与天气相关决策的研究表明,在天气预报中纳入数值不确定性估计比单一值预报或具体建议能提高决策质量。然而,尚不清楚不确定性估计的益处是否能扩展到更复杂的决策任务(可能需要更大的认知努力),或者扩展到决策明确的任务(或许额外的不确定性信息并无必要)。在本研究中,参与者完成了一项任务,即他们使用单一值天气预报,单独使用、结合结冰概率、建议或两者皆用,来决定冬季是否在道路上撒盐以防止结冰,还是不撒盐并承担罚款风险。参与者完成的要么是该任务的简单二元选择版本,要么是具有三个响应选项及相应应用规则的复杂版本。一些参与者看到的是接近冰点的预报,因此是否需要撒盐并不明确,而其他参与者看到的是远低于冰点的预报。结果表明,有不确定性估计的参与者总体表现更好,而且任务复杂性和预报的寒冷程度都未削弱这一优势。然而,意外的是,更冷的预报导致决策更差,且具体建议更具优势。