Galvin Kit, Krenz Jen, Harrington Marcy, Palmández Pablo, Fenske Richard A
a Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(1):113-22. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1107519.
Development of the Practical Solutions for Pesticide Safety guide used participatory research strategies to identify and evaluate solutions that reduce pesticide exposures for workers and their families and to disseminate these solutions. Project principles were (1) workplace chemicals belong in the workplace, and (2) pesticide handlers and farm managers are experts, with direct knowledge of production practices. The project's participatory methods were grounded in self-determination theory. Practical solutions were identified and evaluated based on five criteria: practicality, adaptability, health and safety, novelty, and regulatory compliance. Research activities that had more personal contact provided better outcomes. The Expert Working Group, composed of farm managers and pesticide handlers, was key to the identification of solutions, as were farm site visits. Audience participation, hands-on testing, and orchard field trials were particularly effective in the evaluation of potential solutions. Small work groups in a Regional Advisory Committee provided the best direction and guidance for a "user-friendly" translational document that provided evidence-based practical solutions. The "farmer to farmer" format of the guide was endorsed by both the Expert Working Group and the Regional Advisory Committee. Managers and pesticide handlers wanted to share their solutions in order to "help others stay safe," and they appreciated attribution in the guide. The guide is now being used in educational programs across the region. The fundamental concept that farmers and farmworkers are innovators and experts in agricultural production was affirmed by this study. The success of this process demonstrates the value of participatory industrial hygiene in agriculture.
《农药安全实用解决方案指南》的制定采用了参与式研究策略,以识别和评估减少工人及其家庭农药接触的解决方案,并传播这些解决方案。项目原则为:(1)工作场所化学品应留在工作场所;(2)农药处理人员和农场管理人员是专家,对生产实践有直接了解。该项目的参与式方法基于自我决定理论。根据实用性、适应性、健康与安全、新颖性和法规合规性这五个标准来识别和评估实用解决方案。有更多人际接触的研究活动能产生更好的结果。由农场管理人员和农药处理人员组成的专家工作组对于解决方案的识别至关重要,农场实地考察也是如此。受众参与、实际操作测试和果园田间试验在评估潜在解决方案方面特别有效。区域咨询委员会中的小型工作小组为一份提供基于证据的实用解决方案的“用户友好型”转化文件提供了最佳方向和指导。该指南的“农民对农民”形式得到了专家工作组和区域咨询委员会的认可。管理人员和农药处理人员希望分享他们的解决方案,以便“帮助他人确保安全”,并且他们对指南中的致谢表示赞赏。该指南目前正在该地区的教育项目中使用。这项研究肯定了农民和农场工人作为农业生产创新者和专家的基本概念。这一过程的成功证明了农业中参与式工业卫生的价值。