Moorhouse Tom P, Dahlsjö Cecilia A L, Baker Sandra E, D'Cruze Neil C, Macdonald David W
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney, United Kingdom.
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney, United Kingdom; World Animal Protection (formerly the World Society for the Protection of Animals), London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0138939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138939. eCollection 2015.
Tourism accounts for 9% of global GDP and comprises 1.1 billion tourist arrivals per annum. Visits to wildlife tourist attractions (WTAs) may account for 20-40% of global tourism, but no studies have audited the diversity of WTAs and their impacts on the conservation status and welfare of subject animals. We scored these impacts for 24 types of WTA, visited by 3.6-6 million tourists per year, and compared our scores to tourists' feedback on TripAdvisor. Six WTA types (impacting 1,500-13,000 individual animals) had net positive conservation/welfare impacts, but 14 (120,000-340,000 individuals) had negative conservation impacts and 18 (230,000-550,000 individuals) had negative welfare impacts. Despite these figures only 7.8% of all tourist feedback on these WTAs was negative due to conservation/welfare concerns. We demonstrate that WTAs have substantial negative effects that are unrecognised by the majority of tourists, suggesting an urgent need for tourist education and regulation of WTAs worldwide.
旅游业占全球国内生产总值的9%,每年有11亿人次的游客到访。前往野生动物旅游景点(WTA)的游客可能占全球旅游业的20%-40%,但尚无研究对WTA的多样性及其对相关动物保护状况和福利的影响进行评估。我们对每年有360万至600万游客到访的24种WTA的这些影响进行了评分,并将我们的评分与游客在猫途鹰(TripAdvisor)上的反馈进行了比较。六种WTA类型(影响1500至13000只个体动物)对保护/福利有净积极影响,但14种(120000至340000只个体)有负面保护影响,18种(230000至550000只个体)有负面福利影响。尽管有这些数据,但在这些WTA上,出于保护/福利担忧的负面游客反馈仅占所有游客反馈的7.8%。我们证明,WTA有重大负面影响,但大多数游客并未认识到,这表明迫切需要在全球范围内开展游客教育并对WTA进行监管。