Wilson Ann, Phillips Clive Jc
Applied Behavioural Ecology and Ecosystem Research Unit (ABEERU), Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa.
Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Anim Welf. 2024 Dec 16;33:e61. doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.63. eCollection 2024.
Tourism wildlife interactions are controversial, the debate hinging largely on the compromised welfare of the animals used. Despite this, lion cub () interactions are popular, and there is a need to understand what motivates interactors to participate in the activity, their perceptions and expectations. We surveyed the attitudes of 300 visitors to three lion cub interaction facilities in South Africa. Whilst 38% of interactors were aware of the controversy around lion cub interactions, 69% desired the experience regardless. It is widely assumed that lion cub interaction opportunities are big attractions, yet 74% of respondents said that they would still have visited if lion cub interactions were not offered. Whilst 84% of interactors felt that their expectations were met, 61% said that the interaction had no impact on them. Several of those interviewed interacted with multiple species, and 34% determined that their favourite engagement was with animals that interacted back voluntarily. Most of those interviewed chose the interaction for their children (69%). Whilst 58% felt the experience was educational, only 2% of these had learnt about the plight of lions in the wild. When asked to reflect on the welfare of the lion cubs they had interacted with, 'Freedom from discomfort' was seen as the most important factor, as well as 'Freedom to express natural behaviour'. Interactions were viewed with a variety of emotions and generated a range of beliefs. We conclude that the findings can be used by facilities to better prepare visitors for the experience, ensuring that interaction animals are better able to serve in their role as ambassador representatives.
旅游与野生动物的互动存在争议,争论主要集中在用于互动的动物福利受损问题上。尽管如此,与狮子幼崽的互动很受欢迎,有必要了解是什么促使参与者参与这项活动,以及他们的看法和期望。我们调查了南非三个狮子幼崽互动设施的300名游客的态度。虽然38%的参与者意识到围绕狮子幼崽互动存在争议,但69%的人无论如何都渴望获得这种体验。人们普遍认为狮子幼崽互动机会是很大的吸引力,但74%的受访者表示,如果没有狮子幼崽互动,他们仍然会前来参观。虽然84%的参与者觉得他们的期望得到了满足,但61%的人表示这种互动对他们没有影响。一些受访者与多种物种进行了互动,34%的人确定他们最喜欢的互动对象是能够主动回应的动物。大多数受访者(69%)是为他们的孩子选择了这种互动体验。虽然58%的人觉得这种体验具有教育意义,但其中只有2%的人了解到了野生狮子的困境。当被要求反思他们与之互动的狮子幼崽的福利时,“免于不适”被视为最重要的因素,还有“能够自由表现自然行为”。人们对这种互动有着各种各样的情感看法,并产生了一系列信念。我们得出结论,这些调查结果可供相关设施用来让游客更好地为这种体验做好准备,确保用于互动的动物能够更好地发挥其作为大使代表的作用。