Macdonald David W, Harrington Lauren A, Moorhouse Tom P, D'Cruze Neil
Founder and director.
Harrington is a senior researcher.
Bioscience. 2021 Apr 14;71(8):846-860. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab035. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Wildlife commodification can generate benefits for biodiversity conservation, but it also has negative impacts; overexploitation of wildlife is currently one of the biggest drivers of vertebrate extinction risk. In the present article, we highlight 10 issues that in our experience impede sustainable and humane wildlife trade. Given humanity's increasing demands on the natural world we question whether many aspects of wildlife trade can be compatible with appropriate standards for biodiversity conservation and animal welfare, and suggest that too many elements of wildlife trade as it currently stands are not sustainable for wildlife or for the livelihoods that it supports. We suggest that the onus should be on traders to demonstrate that wildlife use is sustainable, humane, and safe (with respect to disease and invasion risk), rather than on conservationists to demonstrate it is not, that there is a need for a broad acceptance of responsibility and, ultimately, widespread behavior change. We urge conservationists, practitioners, and others to take bold, progressive steps to reach consensus and action.
野生动物商品化可为生物多样性保护带来益处,但也有负面影响;当前,对野生动物的过度开发是脊椎动物面临灭绝风险的最大驱动因素之一。在本文中,我们着重介绍了10个在我们看来阻碍可持续且人道的野生动物贸易的问题。鉴于人类对自然界的需求不断增加,我们质疑野生动物贸易的诸多方面是否能与生物多样性保护及动物福利的适当标准相兼容,并指出就目前而言,野生动物贸易的太多要素对野生动物及其所支持的生计而言是不可持续的。我们建议应由贸易商来证明野生动物利用是可持续、人道且安全的(在疾病和入侵风险方面),而不是由保护主义者来证明其不可持续,即需要广泛接受责任并最终实现广泛的行为改变。我们敦促保护主义者、从业者及其他各方采取大胆、进步的措施以达成共识并付诸行动。