Xie Feng, Pullenayegum Eleanor, Gaebel Kathy, Bansback Nick, Bryan Stirling, Ohinmaa Arto, Poissant Lise, Johnson Jeffrey A
*Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University†Program for Health Economics and Outcome Measures (PHENOM)‡Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton§Child Health Evaluative Sciences Group, Hospital for Sick Kids, Toronto, ON∥School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC¶School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB#School of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447.
The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world.
To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada.
We used age, sex, and education quota sampling from the general population from 4 cities across Canada. Composite time trade-off (cTTO) and traditional time trade-off (tTTO) were used as the main elicitation technique. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states grouped into 10 blocks were valued using cTTO, whereas a subset of 18 severe states was also valued using tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. For the value set development, we used tTTO and positive cTTO values, while censoring negative and zero cTTO values at zero. Models with the main effects presented using linear terms combined with various additional terms were estimated. The preferred model was selected based primarily on logically ordered coefficients, and secondly model fit.
Of the 1209 participants who completed the interview, 136 met criteria that excluded them from the primary analyses. The demographics and socioeconomic status of the remaining 1073 participants were similar to the Canadian general population. The preferred model has 5 linear terms for the main effects, a term for level 4 or 5 for each dimension, and a term for the squared total number of level 4 or 5 beyond the first. For this preferred model, the health utilities ranged from -0.148 for the worst (55555) to 0.949 for the best (11111) EQ-5D-5L states.
This is the first TTO-based value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. It can be used to support the health utility estimation in economic evaluations for reimbursement decision making in Canada.
EQ-5D(EQ-5D-5L)的5级版本最近已开发出来。世界各地的一些国家正在为其开发多种基于偏好的评分系统。
基于加拿大的社会偏好为EQ-5D-5L开发一个价值集。
我们从加拿大4个城市的普通人群中采用年龄、性别和教育配额抽样。复合时间权衡法(cTTO)和传统时间权衡法(tTTO)被用作主要的引出技术。使用cTTO对总共86个分为10组的EQ-5D-5L健康状态进行估值,而18个严重状态的子集也使用tTTO进行估值。不符合预定义不一致标准的参与者被排除在分析之外。对于价值集的开发,我们使用tTTO和正的cTTO值,同时将负的和零的cTTO值截断为零。估计了使用线性项结合各种附加项表示主要效应的模型。首选模型主要基于逻辑有序系数来选择,其次是模型拟合度。
在完成访谈的1209名参与者中,有136人符合将其排除在主要分析之外的标准。其余1073名参与者的人口统计学和社会经济状况与加拿大普通人群相似。首选模型有5个表示主要效应的线性项,每个维度有一个表示4级或5级的项,以及一个表示第一个维度之后4级或5级总数平方的项。对于这个首选模型,健康效用值的范围从最差(55555)的-0.148到最好(11111)的EQ-5D-5L状态的0.949。
这是加拿大首个基于时间权衡法的EQ-5D-5L价值集。它可用于支持加拿大报销决策经济评估中的健康效用估计。