Romero-Sandoval E Alfonso, Asbill Scott, Paige Candler A, Byrd-Glover Kiara
Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, Presbyterian College School of Pharmacy, Clinton, South Carolina.
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Oct;35(10):917-25. doi: 10.1002/phar.1642.
The use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic diseases has increased in the United States, with 23 states having legalized the use of marijuana. Although currently available cannabinoid compounds have shown effectiveness in relieving symptoms associated with numerous diseases, the use of cannabis or cannabinoids is still controversial mostly due to their psychotropic effects (e.g., euphoria, laughter) or central nervous system (CNS)-related undesired effects (e.g., tolerance, dependence). A potential strategy to use cannabinoids for medical conditions without inducing psychotropic or CNS-related undesired effects is to avoid their actions in the CNS. This approach could be beneficial for conditions with prominent peripheral pathophysiologic mechanisms (e.g., painful diabetic neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy). In this article, we discuss the scientific evidence to target the peripheral cannabinoid system as an alternative to cannabis use for medical purposes, and we review the available literature to determine the pros and cons of potential strategies that can be used to this end.
在美国,大麻素用于治疗慢性病的情况有所增加,已有23个州将大麻的使用合法化。尽管目前可用的大麻素化合物已显示出对缓解多种疾病相关症状有效,但大麻或大麻素的使用仍存在争议,主要是因为它们的精神作用(如欣快感、大笑)或与中枢神经系统(CNS)相关的不良影响(如耐受性、依赖性)。一种在不引起精神或中枢神经系统相关不良影响的情况下将大麻素用于医疗状况的潜在策略是避免其在中枢神经系统中的作用。这种方法可能对具有突出外周病理生理机制的病症(如疼痛性糖尿病神经病变、化疗引起的神经病变)有益。在本文中,我们讨论了将外周大麻素系统作为医疗用途替代大麻使用的科学证据,并回顾了现有文献以确定可为此目的使用的潜在策略的利弊。