Luiz T, Scherer G, Wickenkamp A, Blaschke F, Hoffmann W, Schiffer M, Zimmer J, Schaefer S, Voigt C
Deutsches Zentrum für Notfallmedizin & Informationstechnologie, Fraunhofer IESE, Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland.
Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin 1, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2015 Dec;64(12):927-936. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0089-4. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
In contrast to the widespread practice in life-threatening emergencies, delegation of medical pain therapy to paramedics by the medical director of Emergency Medical Services, EMS, are still the exception in Germany. This is due to the fact that in non-life-threatening situations, the expected benefit and potential side effects of drug therapy have to be carefully weighed. In addition, in Germany federal law generally restricts the administration of opiates to physicians.
In 2011 the medical directors of EMS in the German state of Rhineland- Palatinate (4 million inhabitants) developed and implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) for paramedics related to the prehospital parenteral administration of paracetamol for patients with isolated limb trauma. After a 2 h training session and examination, paramedics were authorized to administer 1 g of paracetamol to patients with a pain score > 5 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). For purposes of quality management, every administration of paracetamol had to be prospectively documented on a specific electronic mission form.
A total of 416 mission forms could be analyzed. After administration of paracetamol the median NRS score decreased from 8 points (interquartile range: 6; 8) to 4 points (interquartile range: 3; 7). In 51.2 % of the patients the pain intensity was reduced by at least 3 NRS points and in 50.5 % of the patients the NRS was less than 5 points after treatment. The extent of pain reduction was positively correlated with the initial NRS value (r = 0.31, p < 0.0001). No serious side effects were noted. The percentage of patients with an initial heart rate > 100/min declined from 14.6 % to 5.2 % after the administration of paracetamol (p < 0.0001), 18.7 % of the patients received paracetamol for trauma not related to the extremities and 7 % of the patients for nontraumatic pain. An emergency physician was involved in 50 % of the EMS missions and 98.6 % of the patients were transported to a hospital for further diagnostics and treatment.
The prehospital intravenous administration of paracetamol by paramedics to patients with limb trauma is simple, safe and in 50 % of the patients effective in achieving a NRS value < 5; however, further improvements in prehospital pain therapy initiated by paramedics are desirable, especially in patients with an initial NRS value > 7.
与在危及生命的紧急情况下广泛采用的做法不同,在德国,紧急医疗服务(EMS)的医疗主任将医疗疼痛治疗委托给护理人员的情况仍然是个例外。这是因为在非危及生命的情况下,必须仔细权衡药物治疗的预期益处和潜在副作用。此外,在德国,联邦法律一般将阿片类药物的管理限制在医生范围内。
2011年,德国莱茵兰-普法尔茨州(400万居民)的EMS医疗主任制定并实施了一项针对护理人员的标准操作程序(SOP),用于对孤立肢体创伤患者进行院前静脉注射扑热息痛。经过2小时的培训和考核后,护理人员被授权对数字评分量表(NRS)上疼痛评分>5分的患者给予1克扑热息痛。为了进行质量管理,每次扑热息痛给药都必须前瞻性地记录在特定的电子任务表格上。
总共可以分析416份任务表格。给予扑热息痛后,NRS评分中位数从8分(四分位间距:6;8)降至4分(四分位间距:3;7)。在51.2%的患者中,疼痛强度至少降低了3个NRS评分点,50.5%的患者治疗后NRS评分小于5分。疼痛减轻程度与初始NRS值呈正相关(r = 0.31,p < 0.0001)。未观察到严重副作用。给予扑热息痛后,初始心率>100次/分钟的患者百分比从14.6%降至5.2%(p < 0.0001),18.7%的患者因非四肢相关创伤接受扑热息痛治疗,7%的患者因非创伤性疼痛接受治疗。50%的EMS任务中有急诊医生参与,98.6%的患者被送往医院进行进一步诊断和治疗。
护理人员对肢体创伤患者进行院前静脉注射扑热息痛简单、安全,且50%的患者能有效使NRS评分<5;然而,护理人员发起的院前疼痛治疗仍需进一步改进,尤其是对于初始NRS评分>7的患者。