Suppr超能文献

院前使用纳布啡和对乙酰氨基酚镇痛的效果和安全性:一项观察性研究。

Effectiveness and safety of prehospital analgesia including nalbuphine and paracetamol by paramedics: an observational study.

机构信息

Service of Emergency Medicine, Guetersloh, Germany.

Service of Emergency Medicine, Osnabrueck, Germany.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Dec;89(12):1105-1114. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17537-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of prehospital analgesia with nalbuphine and/or paracetamol by paramedics.

METHODS

In this retrospective trial, following the implementation of a standard-operating-procedure for pain requiring treatment as defined as a score ≥4 on the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale for pain, all emergency operations in the district of Gütersloh between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, with analgesic administration by paramedics in patients ≥18 years were included in the study. Analgesic agents employed by the paramedics included nalbuphine and/or paracetamol, butylscopolamine for abdominal colic, and esketamine in case of failure of the other analgesics. The primary endpoint was the patients' rating of their pain on the Numeric Rating Scale at the end of the operation. Additional covariates included sex, cause of pain, analgesics used, Numeric Rating Scale at beginning and analgesic-associated complications (reduced level of consciousness, hypotension, desaturation, a- or bradypnea).

RESULTS

A total of 1931 emergency operations (female: N.=1039 [53.8%]) with pain requiring treatment (non-traumatic cause: N.=1106 [57.3%]; initial Numeric Rating Scale: 8.0±1.4). Analgesics applied were nalbuphine + paracetamol (50.6%), paracetamol (38.7%), butylscopolamine (13.4%), nalbuphine (7.7%), and esketamine (4.9%). Mean pain reduction was 4.3±2.3 (nalbuphine + paracetamol: 5.0±2.1; nalbuphine: 4.7±2.3) and paracetamol: 3.3±2.2, respectively. Factors influencing a change in the Numeric Rating Scale were trauma (regression-coefficient: -0.308, 95% CI: -0.496 - -0.119, P=0.0014 vs. non-trauma; nalbuphine [yes vs. no]: regression-coefficient 0.684, 95% CI 0.0774-1.291, P=0.03; nalbuphine + paracetamol: regression-coefficient 0.763, 95% CI 0.227-1.299, P=0.005). At the end of the operation, 49.7% had a Numeric Rating Scale <4, 34.3% had a Numeric Rating Scale 4-5, and 16.0% had a Numeric Rating Scale ≥6. Factors influencing a Numeric Rating Scale <4 at end of use were trauma vs. non-trauma: odds ratio 0.788, 95% CI 0.649-0.957, P=0.02. The Numeric Rating Scale at beginning reported: odds ratios 0.754, 95% CI 0.700-0.812, P<0.0001. Analgesic-associated complications were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital analgesia by paramedics with nalbuphine as monotherapy or in combination with paracetamol allows for sufficient analgesia without the occurrence of complications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估急救人员使用纳布啡和/或扑热息痛进行院前镇痛的效果和安全性。

方法

在这项回顾性试验中,在实施了一项标准操作程序后,对于疼痛需要治疗的患者(定义为疼痛数字评分量表[0-10]的评分≥4),在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间,古尔茨洛地区所有急救操作中,急救人员为≥18 岁的患者使用镇痛剂。急救人员使用的镇痛剂包括纳布啡和/或扑热息痛、丁溴东莨菪碱(用于治疗腹痛)和 Esketamine(其他镇痛药无效时使用)。主要终点是患者在操作结束时对疼痛的数字评分量表评分。其他协变量包括性别、疼痛原因、使用的镇痛药、开始时的数字评分量表和与镇痛药相关的并发症(意识水平降低、低血压、低氧饱和度、呼吸过缓或呼吸暂停)。

结果

共纳入 1931 例疼痛需要治疗的急救操作(女性:N=1039[53.8%])(非创伤性原因:N=1106[57.3%];初始数字评分量表:8.0±1.4)。应用的镇痛药包括纳布啡+扑热息痛(50.6%)、扑热息痛(38.7%)、丁溴东莨菪碱(13.4%)、纳布啡(7.7%)和 Esketamine(4.9%)。平均疼痛缓解程度为 4.3±2.3(纳布啡+扑热息痛:5.0±2.1;纳布啡:4.7±2.3)和扑热息痛:3.3±2.2。影响数字评分量表变化的因素有创伤(回归系数:-0.308,95%置信区间:-0.496- -0.119,P=0.0014 与非创伤性;纳布啡[是 vs. 否]:回归系数 0.684,95%置信区间 0.0774-1.291,P=0.03;纳布啡+扑热息痛:回归系数 0.763,95%置信区间 0.227-1.299,P=0.005)。操作结束时,49.7%的患者数字评分量表<4,34.3%的患者数字评分量表为 4-5,16.0%的患者数字评分量表≥6。影响操作结束时数字评分量表<4 的因素有创伤与非创伤:比值比 0.788,95%置信区间 0.649-0.957,P=0.02。报告的初始数字评分量表:比值比 0.754,95%置信区间 0.700-0.812,P<0.0001。未观察到与镇痛药相关的并发症。

结论

急救人员使用纳布啡单药或联合扑热息痛进行院前镇痛可实现充分的镇痛效果,且无并发症发生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验