Nataatmadja Melissa, Cho Yeoungjee, Fahim Magid, Johnson David W
Department of Nephrology, Level 2, Ambulatory Renal and Transplant Services Building, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba QLD 4102, Australia.
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2016;11(1):12-32. doi: 10.2174/1574887110666151026123235.
As a consequence of both traditional and non-traditional risk factors, cardiovascular disease is over-represented, and the leading cause of mortality, among patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Whilst recommendations for reducing cardiovascular risk in the general population exist, their applicability to the CKD population is questionable due to the exclusion of CKD patients from the majority of contemporary cardiovascular interventional studies. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the literature regarding pharmacologic cardiovascular interventions in patients with CKD, with an emphasis on studies published since our 2008 review. Interventions discussed include erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (TREAT, U.S. Normal Hematocrit, CHOIR, CREATE, Palmer meta-analysis); statins (SHARP, AURORA, PPP, 4D, ALERT); Fibrates (VA-HIT); Folic Acid (ASFAST, US FOLIC acid trial, HOST); Antihypertensive Agents, Including Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, Beta-blockers and Combination therapy (Cice et al, FOSDIAL, Agarwal et al, ONTARGET); sevelamer (DCOR); Cinacalcet (ADVANCE, EVOLVE, Cunningham meta-analysis); Anti-oxidants (SPACE, HOPE, ATIC); Aspirin (HOT study re-analysis); vitamin D analogues (PRIMO); and multidisciplinary intervention (LANDMARK). Unfortunately, there remains a paucity of evidence in this area and a large number of methodologically poor quality studies with negative results. It is possible that these interventions do not have the same positive effect in CKD patients due to differences in the pathogenesis driving cardiovascular disease burden, such as altered bone metabolism and calcific vascular disease. Further well-designed studies with appropriately selected study populations and patient level outcomes are required. Until such time, physicians must consider on an individual patient basis the appropriateness of these interventions.
由于传统和非传统风险因素的影响,在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中,心血管疾病的比例过高,且是主要死因。虽然存在针对普通人群降低心血管风险的建议,但由于大多数当代心血管介入研究将CKD患者排除在外,这些建议对CKD人群的适用性存在疑问。本综述的目的是严格评估关于CKD患者药物性心血管干预的文献,重点关注自我们2008年综述以来发表的研究。讨论的干预措施包括促红细胞生成剂(TREAT、美国正常血细胞比容、CHOIR、CREATE、帕尔默荟萃分析);他汀类药物(SHARP、AURORA、PPP、4D、ALERT);贝特类药物(VA-HIT);叶酸(ASFAST、美国叶酸试验、HOST);抗高血压药物,包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂及联合治疗(西切等人、FOSDIAL、阿加瓦尔等人、ONTARGET);司维拉姆(DCOR);西那卡塞(ADVANCE、EVOLVE、坎宁安荟萃分析);抗氧化剂(SPACE、HOPE、ATIC);阿司匹林(HOT研究重新分析);维生素D类似物(PRIMO);以及多学科干预(LANDMARK)。不幸的是,该领域仍然缺乏证据,并且有大量方法学质量较差且结果为阴性的研究。由于导致心血管疾病负担的发病机制存在差异,如骨代谢改变和血管钙化性疾病,这些干预措施在CKD患者中可能没有相同的积极效果。需要进一步开展设计良好、研究人群选择恰当且以患者个体水平结局为指标的研究。在此之前,医生必须根据每个患者的情况考虑这些干预措施的适用性。