Settecase Fabio, Martin Alastair J, Lillaney Prasheel, Losey Aaron, Hetts Steven W
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, L351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, L-310, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;23(4):591-605. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
The use of MR guidance for endovascular intervention is appealing because of its lack of ionizing radiation, high-contrast visualization of vessel walls and adjacent soft tissues, multiplanar capabilities, and potential to incorporate functional information such as flow, fluid dynamics, perfusion, and cardiac motion. This review highlights state-of-the-art imaging techniques and hardware used for passive tracking of endovascular devices in interventional MR imaging, including negative contrast, passive contrast, nonproton multispectral, and direct current techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of passive tracking relative to active tracking are also summarized.
由于磁共振(MR)引导下的血管内介入治疗缺乏电离辐射、能对血管壁和相邻软组织进行高对比度成像、具备多平面成像能力以及能够整合诸如血流、流体动力学、灌注和心脏运动等功能信息,因此其应用颇具吸引力。本综述重点介绍了用于介入性磁共振成像中血管内装置被动跟踪的先进成像技术和硬件,包括阴性对比、被动对比、非质子多光谱和直流电技术。还总结了被动跟踪相对于主动跟踪的优缺点。