Yin Xin Hua, Zhou Zhen Hai, Yu Hong Gui, Hu Xiong Ke, Guo Qiang, Zhang Hong Qi
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Jan;32(1):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2935-8.
There are few papers in the literature comparing outcomes between antero-posterior and posterior-only approaches for treating thoracolumbar tuberculosis (T10–L2) in children.
We performed a retrospective review of 47 children who were diagnosed and treated as thoracolumbar tuberculosis (T10–L2) in our department from January 2005 to June 2009. Forty-seven cases of thoracolumbar tuberculosis were treated by two different surgical approaches. All the cases were divided into two groups: 25 cases in group A underwent one-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal fusion, and instrumentation, and 22 cases in group B underwent anterior debridement, bone graft, and posterior instrumentation in a single- or two-stage procedure. Two approaches were compared in terms of average operative time, blood loss, hospitalizations, bony fusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, the Oswestry disability index score, neurological status, and the angle of kyphosis.
All 47 patients (24 M/23F), averaged 9.1 ± 2.6 years old (range 5 to 14 years), who were followed up for mean of 49.3 ± 8.6 months (range 36 to 65 months). Spinal tuberculosis (TB) was completely cured, and the grafted bones were fused in 9 months in all cases. It was obviously that the average operative time, blood loss, hospitalization, and complication rate of group A was less than those of group B. Good clinical outcomes were achieved in both groups.
Both the antero-posterior and posterior approaches can effectively heal T10–L2 vertebral tuberculosis, but the average surgical time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay following the posterior approach are prominently less than those following the antero-posterior approach. It might be a better surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in children with poor health status, especially for cases in early phase of bone destruction and/or mild and moderate kyphosis.
文献中很少有比较前后路联合与单纯后路治疗儿童胸腰椎结核(T10 - L2)疗效的文章。
我们对2005年1月至2009年6月在我科诊断并治疗的47例胸腰椎结核(T10 - L2)患儿进行了回顾性研究。47例胸腰椎结核采用两种不同的手术方法治疗。所有病例分为两组:A组25例行一期后路清创、经椎间孔融合及内固定术,B组22例行前路清创、植骨及后路内固定,采用一期或两期手术。比较两种手术方法的平均手术时间、出血量、住院时间、骨融合情况、术中及术后并发症、Oswestry功能障碍指数评分、神经功能状态和后凸角度。
47例患者(24例男性/23例女性),平均年龄9.1±2.6岁(5至14岁),平均随访49.3±8.6个月(36至65个月)。脊柱结核均完全治愈,所有病例植骨均在9个月内融合。显然,A组的平均手术时间、出血量、住院时间和并发症发生率均低于B组。两组均取得了良好的临床效果。
前后路联合和后路手术均可有效治愈T10 - L2椎体结核,但后路手术的平均手术时间、出血量、并发症和住院时间明显少于前后路联合手术。对于健康状况较差的儿童胸段脊柱结核,尤其是骨破坏早期和/或轻中度后凸畸形的病例,后路手术可能是一种更好的手术治疗方法。