• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对阿布扎比老年住院患者用药管理中医师经历的探索。

An exploration of health professionals' experiences of medicines management in elderly, hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi.

作者信息

Al Shemeili Saeed, Klein Susan, Strath Alison, Fares Saleh, Stewart Derek

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):107-18. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0212-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-015-0212-2
PMID:26499504
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the multiplicity of issues relating to medicines in the elderly, the structures and processes of medicines management should be clearly defined and described to optimise patient outcomes. There is a paucity of research which provides an in-depth exploration of these elements of medicines management for elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study explored health professionals’ experiences of medicines management for elderly, hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi. Setting The research was conducted in five major hospitals in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates.

METHOD

Responses to an online sampling questionnaire were used to purposively select nurses, pharmacists and physicians for interview. A semi-structured interview schedule was developed with reference to normalization process theory (NPT) and the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to explore issues of medicines management structures, processes and outcomes. Face-to-face interviews of 20–30 min were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Health professionals’ in-depth experiences of structures, processes and outcomes relating to medicines management. Results Saturation of themes was deemed to occur at interview 27 (7 nurses, 13 pharmacists, 7 physicians). Six key themes and several subthemes emerged from the qualitative analysis, which pertained to the need for: appropriate polypharmacy; a systematic approach to medicines history taking; improved communication and documentation; improved patients’ adherence to medicines; guidelines and policies to support medicines selection, and an educated and trained multidisciplinary team. The most dominant TDF behavioural determinants were issues around: professional role and identity; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; environmental context and resources; knowledge, and goals. NPT construct identified little evidence of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring.

CONCLUSION

The key themes identified in this research indicate the need to develop a more structured approach to medicines management in elderly hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi. The NPT constructs and the TDF behavioural determinants can be utilised as part of service development and implementing change.

摘要

背景

鉴于老年人用药相关问题的多样性,应明确界定和描述药物管理的结构与流程,以优化患者治疗效果。目前缺乏深入探讨老年患者药物管理这些要素的研究。

目的

本研究探讨了阿联酋阿布扎比老年住院患者药物管理方面医护人员的经验。研究地点:该研究在阿联酋阿布扎比的五家主要医院开展。

方法

采用在线抽样问卷的回复,有目的地挑选护士、药剂师和医生进行访谈。参照规范化过程理论(NPT)和理论领域框架(TDF)制定了半结构化访谈提纲,以探讨药物管理结构、流程和结果等问题。进行了20 - 30分钟的面对面访谈,进行录音、逐字转录,并采用框架分析法进行分析。

主要观察指标

医护人员对药物管理结构、流程和结果的深入体验。结果:在第27次访谈(7名护士、13名药剂师、7名医生)时主题达到饱和。定性分析得出六个关键主题和若干子主题,涉及以下需求:合理的联合用药;系统的用药史采集方法;改善沟通与记录;提高患者的用药依从性;支持药物选择的指南和政策,以及一支受过教育和培训的多学科团队。TDF中最主要的行为决定因素围绕以下方面:专业角色与身份;对能力的信念;对后果的信念;环境背景与资源;知识,以及目标。NPT构建中几乎没有一致性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监测的证据。

结论

本研究确定的关键主题表明,需要为阿联酋阿布扎比的老年住院患者制定更结构化的药物管理方法。NPT构建和TDF行为决定因素可作为服务发展和实施变革的一部分加以利用。

相似文献

1
An exploration of health professionals' experiences of medicines management in elderly, hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi.对阿布扎比老年住院患者用药管理中医师经历的探索。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):107-18. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0212-2.
2
Exploring behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.探索与医疗专业人员报告用药错误相关的行为决定因素:一项使用理论领域框架的定性研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;72(7):887-95. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2054-9. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
3
A modified Delphi study of structures and processes related to medicines management for elderly hospitalised patients in the United Arab Emirates.阿联酋老年住院患者药品管理相关结构与流程的改良德尔菲研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Oct;22(5):781-91. doi: 10.1111/jep.12542. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Community pharmacists' views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews.社区药剂师对使用筛查工具构建老年人用药审查的看法:定性访谈结果
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1086-1095. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
Collaborative prescribing: a qualitative exploration of a role for pharmacists in mental health.协作处方:对药师在精神健康中作用的定性探索。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
6
Health professional perspectives on the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy for older patients in Australia.澳大利亚医疗专业人员对老年患者多重疾病和多重用药管理的看法。
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):291-299. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw200.
7
Promoting weight management services in community pharmacy: perspectives of the pharmacy team in Scotland.在社区药房推广体重管理服务:苏格兰药房团队的观点
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Aug;37(4):599-606. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0102-7. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Improving appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care: selecting components of an evidence-based intervention to target prescribing and dispensing.改善基层医疗中老年人的合理联合用药:选择基于证据的干预措施组成部分以针对处方开具和配药环节
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 16;10:161. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0349-3.
9
Exploring pharmacists' views on an in-pharmacy medication review program in Australia using a mixed-methods design.采用混合方法设计探索澳大利亚药剂师对药房内药物审查项目的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1385-1395. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01102-4. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
10
Physician experiences with clinical pharmacists in primary care teams.基层医疗团队中医生与临床药师的合作经验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Nov-Dec;57(6):686-691. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming Barriers in Nurse-Pharmacist Collaborations on Wards - Qualitative Expert Interviews with Nurses and Pharmacists.克服病房中医护协作的障碍——对护士和药剂师的定性专家访谈
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Apr 5;16:937-949. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S408390. eCollection 2023.
2
Nurses' Experiences Concerning Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings.护士对患有多重用药的老年人的经验:定性研究结果的元综合分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;11(3):334. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030334.
3
Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Doctors' perspectives on the barriers to appropriate prescribing in older hospitalized patients: a qualitative study.医生对老年住院患者合理用药障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;79(5):860-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12555.
2
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2.老年人潜在不适当处方的STOPP/START标准:第2版
Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):213-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu145. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
Prevalence of polypharmacy in a Scottish primary care population.苏格兰初级保健人群中多重用药的患病率。
针对多病共存和多种药物治疗的老年人减药:TAILOR 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(32):1-148. doi: 10.3310/AAFO2475.
4
Reviewing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Hospitalized Patients Over 65 Using Explicit Criteria: A Systematic Literature Review.使用明确标准对65岁以上住院患者潜在不适当用药进行的回顾:一项系统文献综述。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 Nov 3;13:183-210. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S303101. eCollection 2021.
5
Factors influencing allied health professionals' implementation of upper limb sensory rehabilitation for stroke survivors: a qualitative study to inform knowledge translation.影响康复治疗师对中风幸存者实施上肢感觉康复的因素:一项为知识转化提供信息的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 19;11(2):e042879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042879.
6
Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review.定义和评估医疗保健实施研究中的背景:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7.
7
Challenges of deprescribing in the multimorbid patient.多病共存患者减药的挑战。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):43-46. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000921.
8
Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.运用常态化进程理论对复杂医疗干预措施的可行性研究和进程评估:系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;70(5):575-81. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1639-9. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools.不适当处方:已发表评估工具的系统综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;70(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1575-8. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
5
The prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in primary care practice: a PPRNet report.基层医疗中慢性病和多种疾病共存的流行情况:PPRNet 报告。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):518-24. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130012.
6
Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews.患者依从性的决定因素:系统评价综述。
Front Pharmacol. 2013 Jul 25;4:91. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00091. eCollection 2013.
7
Medication reconciliation: A qualitative analysis of clinicians' perceptions.药物重整:临床医生认知的定性分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jul-Aug;9(4):419-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8
Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity.调整临床指南以考虑共病情况。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 4;345:e6341. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6341.
9
Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity.针对患者而非疾病的指南:将英国临床指南应用于多病共存患者的挑战。
Age Ageing. 2013 Jan;42(1):62-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs100. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
10
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.改善老年人合理使用多种药物的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16(5):CD008165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub2.