Uhrenholt Lars, Freeman Michael D, Webb Alexandra L, Pedersen Michael, Boel Lene Warner Thorup
Department of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8000, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Paraclinical Imaging Studies Group (PIMAS), Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015 Dec;11(4):564-9. doi: 10.1007/s12024-015-9715-3. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
Spinal injury following inertial loading of the head and neck (whiplash) is a common sequel of low speed traffic crashes. A variety of non-musculoskeletal injuries have been described in association with injury to the spine following whiplash trauma, including traumatic brain injury, vestibular derangement, and cranial nerve injury, among others. Vascular injuries in the head and neck have, however, only rarely been described. We present the case of a middle-aged male who sustained an ultimately fatal injury that resulted from injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) and intracerebral vascular structures following a hard braking maneuver, with no direct head- or neck contact with the vehicular interior. Based on this unusual mechanism of injury we reviewed hospital data from the United States nationwide inpatient database (NIS) to assess the frequency of similar injuries reportedly resulting from traffic crashes. The post-mortem examination revealed a left internal carotid artery dissection associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Based on the close temporal association, the absent prior history, and the plausibility of the injury mechanism, the injury was attributed to the braking maneuver. An analysis of NIS data demonstrated that the prevalence of subarachnoid hemorrhage is significantly higher when there is a traumatic etiology, and higher yet when the trauma is a traffic crash (odds ratio 3.3 and 4.3, respectively). The presented case, together with the hospital inpatient data analysis, indicate that although SAH in combination with ICA dissection is relatively rare, it is substantially more probable following a traffic crash. In a clinical or forensic setting the inference that magnitude of a trauma was low should not serve as a basis for either excluding a cervical artery dissection from a differential diagnosis, or for excluding the trauma as a cause of a diagnosed dissection. This case report illustrates a rare fatal outcome of inertial load to the head and neck induced by a sudden braking event in a commonly experienced non-collision traffic incident. The likely mechanism of injury resulted from interaction between the occupant and the 3-point seat belt. These findings indicate that ICA dissections are substantially more likely to be associated with SAH following head and neck trauma, regardless of the magnitude of the traumatic event or whether an impact was involved.
头部和颈部惯性负荷(挥鞭样损伤)后的脊柱损伤是低速交通事故的常见后遗症。与挥鞭样创伤后脊柱损伤相关的各种非肌肉骨骼损伤已被描述,包括创伤性脑损伤、前庭紊乱和颅神经损伤等。然而,头颈部血管损伤很少被描述。我们报告一例中年男性病例,该患者在一次急刹车操作后,因颈内动脉(ICA)和脑内血管结构损伤而最终导致致命伤,头部和颈部未与车内直接接触。基于这种不寻常的损伤机制,我们回顾了来自美国全国住院患者数据库(NIS)的医院数据,以评估据报道由交通事故导致的类似损伤的发生率。尸检显示左侧颈内动脉夹层伴蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)。基于紧密的时间关联、既往史缺失以及损伤机制的合理性,该损伤归因于急刹车操作。对NIS数据的分析表明,当存在创伤性病因时,蛛网膜下腔出血的患病率显著更高,而当创伤为交通事故时则更高(优势比分别为3.3和4.3)。本病例以及医院住院患者数据分析表明,尽管SAH合并ICA夹层相对罕见,但在交通事故后发生的可能性要大得多。在临床或法医环境中,认为创伤程度低的推断不应作为从鉴别诊断中排除颈动脉夹层或排除创伤作为已诊断夹层病因的依据。本病例报告说明了在常见的非碰撞交通事故中,突然刹车事件导致的头部和颈部惯性负荷的罕见致命后果。可能的损伤机制是乘员与三点式安全带之间的相互作用。这些发现表明,无论创伤事件的严重程度或是否涉及撞击,头颈部创伤后ICA夹层与SAH相关的可能性要大得多。